Displaying Disciplinarity

Written Communication Apr 1996

DALE L. SULLIVAN

Abstract

Publishing in professional journals requires the author to display disciplinarity and yet to say something novel. This article approaches this familiar rhetorical problem from a novel perspective by analyzing disciplinarity as a kind of orthodoxy. Four elements of orthodoxy (narrative knowledge, assumptions and methodologies, hierarchy, and doctrinal knowledge) are identified. Then, the article argues that an orthodox ethos is created by signaling allegiance to a plurality of these elements. An example of an article that displays disciplinarity, David Raup's “Cohort analysis of generic survivorship,” is analyzed, showing the author establishes his orthodox ethos by challenging only one of the elements of orthodoxy while simultaneously signaling allegiance to the others.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 1996-04-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088396013002003
Open Access: Closed
Topics: argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

Casper (2007)

In Praise of Carbon, In Praise of Science

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Geisler et al. (2001)

IText

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Smith (2000)

Points of reference in technical communication scholarship

Technical Communication Quarterly
Sullivan (1999)

Beyond discourse communities: Orthodoxies and the rhetoric of sectarianism

Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (10)

MacDonald (1996)

Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences

College Composition and Communication
PRIOR (1994)

Response, Revision, Disciplinarity

Written Communication
Taylor (1994)

Science as cultural practice: A rhetorical perspective

Technical Communication Quarterly
Ervin (1993)

Interdisciplinarity or “an elaborate edifice built on sand”? Rethinking rhetori…

Rhetoric Review
GRAGSON et al. (1990)

Fictionalizing the Readers of Scholarly Articles in Biology

Written Communication

Show all 10 →

KAUFER et al. (1989)

Novelty in Academic Writing

Written Communication
SWALES et al. (1987)

The Writing of Research Article Introductions

Written Communication
Bruffee (1984)

Collaborative Learning and the "Conversation of Mankind"

College English
Halloran (1984)

The birth of molecular biology: An essay in the rhetorical criticism of scienti…

Rhetoric Review
Halloran (1982)

Aristotle's concept of ethos, or if not his somebody else's

Rhetoric Review

Also cites 21 works outside this index ↓

10.1007/BF02017065

↗
Berkenkotter, C.

Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication

↗
10.1177/016224399401900106

↗
10.1177/016344378000200305

↗
10.1080/00335637509383301

↗
10.2307/376707

↗
Fairclough, N.

Language and power

↗
Fairclough, N.

Critical language awareness

↗
10.2307/357716

↗
Giddens, A.

Central problems in social theory

↗
10.1080/00335638609383757

↗
Jaeger, W.

Paideia: The ideals of Greek culture

↗
10.1080/00335638909383871

↗
10.1080/00335638609383764

↗
10.1080/03637758909390253

↗
10.2307/461344

↗
10.1017/S0094837300005649

↗
10.2307/377164

↗
Schiappa, E.

Protagoras and logos: A study in Greek philosophy and rhetoric

↗
10.1525/rh.1994.12.3.237

↗
10.2307/2089577

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 23 View in citation network →