Beyond discourse communities: Orthodoxies and the rhetoric of sectarianism

Dale L. Sullivan Michigan Technological University

Abstract

In Rescuing Discourse of Community, Gregory Clark hinted that pedagogy based on theory of discourse was in a state of crisis. In this article Clark put forward a theory of ethical participation that he believed would rescue attempts characterize writing classrooms as discourse communities. But even as he did so, he acknowledged that pedagogical practices based on rhetoric of discourse can put into motion processes that tend minimize or exclude participation of some people as they establish dominance of others (61). Others shared same concern. Joseph Harris had argued, goals as teachers need not be initiate our students into values and practices of some new community, but offer them chance reflect critically on those discourses (19). Marilyn Cooper warned that discourse may develop static standards, which are then used to determine who is and who is not a member of (204). Mary Louise Pratt characterized them as imaginary utopian communities that do not accurately represent fractured reality (50-51). Carolyn Miller said the domination of communal is a political and rhetorical problem because it seems restrict and control what can be said, what can ever be found persuasive (Rhetoric and Community 86). And Jim W. Corder, who likened discourse tribes, said that being part of such tribes represses individual's own capacities for observation, thus violating private virtues (306). These critics did not actually deny that discourse exist. Most accepted that discourse communities, like Dell Hymes' communities, exist and that they are that share rules for conduct and interpretation of speech (Hymes 54). But assumption that writing classroom constitutes such a community soon became untenable. Meanwhile, study of discourse flourished on another front as researchers investigated disciplinary and professional discourse. As Charlotte Thralls and Nancy Roundy Blyler say, the concept of a discourse community has given researchers a way talk about workplace writing in both industrial and academic settings (8). Among those doing such work, Greg Myers analyzed

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
1999-09-01
DOI
10.1080/07350199909359261
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Written Communication
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 6 →
  1. College English
Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1007/BF02017065
  2. 10.2307/358587
  3. 10.2307/1384673
  4. 10.2307/1387250
  5. 10.1080/10510977809367982
    Central States Speech Journal  
  6. 10.1080/00335638609383757
  7. 10.2307/358177
  8. 10.1080/00335638909383887
  9. 10.2307/2090070
  10. 10.1086/218181
  11. 10.2307/587942
  12. 10.1080/03637758909390253
  13. 10.1080/10510977809367983
    Central States Speech Journal  
  14. 10.2307/358241
  15. 10.1080/00335639109383973
  16. 10.2307/1385935
  17. 10.1086/227169
  18. Studies in the Theory of Ideology
  19. 10.2307/2089577
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →