Fictionalizing the Readers of Scholarly Articles in Biology

Written Communication Jan 1990

Fictionalizing the Readers of Scholarly Articles in Biology

GAY GRAGSON Pennsylvania State University ; JACK SELZER

Abstract

Is “the writer's audience always a fiction,” as Walter Ong contends, even when the writing is not poetry or fiction but scientific prose? To demonstrate the usefulness of Ong's approach to audience for analysts of nonfiction prose and for those who wish to empower student writers, we consider from a reader-response perspective two scientific articles on the same general topic written for the same discourse community in the same year. The authors of the two essays (prestigious scientists) directed their readers into two radically different roles. One makes his readers not only into “conventional” scientists but into willing novices who take note of his presentation but who do not take issue with it; the other creates disciplinary nonconformists, inquistive skeptics who have the perspectives necessary to understand the limits of scientific thought. The analysis elaborates the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse, demonstrates that even within the constraints of the journal article scientists have considerable freedom to exercise choices, and explicates how writers use cues to direct readers into fictional roles.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 1990-01-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088390007001002
Open Access: Closed
Topics: discourse analysis

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

Harwood (2006)

(In)appropriate Personal Pronoun Use in Political Science

Written Communication
SULLIVAN (1996)

Displaying Disciplinarity

Written Communication
HAAS (1994)

Learning to Read Biology

Written Communication
Mirel (1994)

Debating nuclear energy: Theories of risk and purposes of communication

Technical Communication Quarterly
Allen (1993)

Community, collaboration, and the rhetorical triangle

Technical Communication Quarterly

Show all 6 →

Blakeslee (1993)

Readers and authors: Fictionalized constructs or dynamic collaborations?

Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (4)

MYERS (1985)

The Social Construction of Two Biologists' Proposals

Written Communication
Halloran (1984)

The birth of molecular biology: An essay in the rhetorical criticism of scienti…

Rhetoric Review
Park (1982)

The Meanings of "Audience"

College English
Gibson (1950)

Authors, Speakers, Readers, and Mock Readers

College English

Also cites 16 works outside this index ↓

10.1177/004839318101100305

↗
10.1080/00335637009382992

↗
Booth, W.

The rhetoric of fiction

↗
10.1080/00335637509383302

↗
10.2307/358093

↗
10.1038/332211b0

↗
10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05637.x

↗
10.1098/rspb.1979.0086

↗
10.2307/356377

↗
10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.000335

↗
10.1038/330516a0

↗
10.1086/284064

↗
10.2307/461344

↗
10.2307/357917

↗
Tompkins, J.

Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism

↗
10.1080/10570317609373907

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →