Abstract

This article describes five political scientists’ interview-based accounts of appropriate and inappropriate use of the pronouns I and we in academic writing. The informants talked about pronoun use with reference to one of their own journal articles and also by referring to other informants’ texts. Beliefs about appropriate and inappropriate use varied widely, and it was emphasized that the discipline encompasses a number of subdisciplines, which helps account for these differing pronoun preferences. The insights and implications of the study are discussed, and a heuristic that combines corpus-based and interview-based approaches to the investigation of pronouns is proposed. The corpus-based part of the heuristic provides the researcher with data on typical disciplinary patterns of pronoun use, whereas the interview-based part provides accounts of informants’ motivations and intentions that inform their pronoun use. It is argued that the heuristic could be adapted to investigate other linguistic features in academic writing.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2006-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088306293921
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication

References (42) · 4 in this index

  1. Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies
  2. Shaping written knowledge
  3. Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in pr…
  4. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 42 →
  1. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
  2. 10.3998/mpub.8903
  3. Academic writing in a second language
  4. Writing: Texts, processes and practices
  5. 10.4324/9780203224342
  6. Written Communication
  7. Understanding scientific prose
  8. 10.1016/j.esp.2004.10.002
  9. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  10. 10.1093/applin/ami012
  11. Harwood, N. (in press). Political scientists on the functions of personal pronouns in their writing: An inter…
  12. 10.4135/9781412986120
  13. TEXT & TALK
  14. Written Communication
  15. 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
  16. 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
  17. 10.1177/1461445605050365
  18. 10.1075/swll.5
  19. 10.1017/S0958344005000613
  20. An introduction to corpus linguistics
  21. 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6
  22. InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing
  23. English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik
  24. Student writing: Access, regulation, desire
  25. Written Communication
  26. Qualitative researching
  27. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook
  28. 10.1093/applin/10.1.1
  29. Research on writing: Principles and methods
  30. Qualitative research and evaluation methods
  31. Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy
  32. A comprehensive grammar of English
  33. 10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5
  34. 10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00128.x
    International Journal of Applied Linguistics  
  35. Personal pronouns in present-day English
  36. 10.1093/applin/21.1.3
  37. Writing up qualitative research