Ethnography as Method, Methodology, and “Deep Theorizing”

Theresa Lillis The Open University

Abstract

This article critically explores the value of ethnography for enhancing context-sensitive approaches to the study of academic writing. Drawing on data from two longitudinal studies, student writing in the United Kingdom and professional academic writing in Hungary, Slovakia, Spain, and Portugal, the author illustrates the different contributions ethnography can make to researching academic writing, depending on the level at which it is construed, as method, methodology, or “deep theorizing.” In discussing the third level of ethnography, the author draws on recent debates around linguistic ethnography to explore how ethnography as deep theorizing can contribute to refining social practice accounts of academic writing through the specific notions of indexicality and orientation. By working through three levels of ethnography, her aim is to signal the ontological gap between text and context in academic writing research and to open up debate about how this gap can be narrowed.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2008-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088308319229
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (19)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Written Communication
Show all 19 →
  1. College English
  2. Written Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. Written Communication
  7. Written Communication
  8. Written Communication
  9. Written Communication
  10. Written Communication
  11. Written Communication
  12. Written Communication
  13. Written Communication
  14. Written Communication

Cites in this index (13)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. Written Communication
  7. Written Communication
  8. Written Communication
Also cites 35 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4324/9780203448885
  2. 10.1080/10350330701311470
  3. 10.1017/CBO9780511610295
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00346.x
  5. Ethnography unbound: From theory to critical praxis
  6. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjn6c
  7. Chang, Y.Y. & Swales, J.M. (1999). Informal elements in English academic writing: Threats or opportunities fo…
  8. 10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_257
  9. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjpc7
  10. 10.2307/3588284
  11. 10.2307/3588099
  12. 10.2307/3587862
  13. 10.1016/0889-4906(94)00022-6
  14. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
  15. 10.1080/17457820500512697
  16. 10.4135/9780857020277
  17. 10.1093/applin/20.3.341
  18. 10.4324/9780203006603
  19. 10.1075/swll.5
  20. 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90006-6
  21. 10.4324/9780203451311
  22. 10.1080/03075079812331380364
  23. 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00084.x
  24. 10.1080/09500780308666848
  25. Lillis, T. (2006). Moving towards an academic literacies pedagogy: `Dialogues of participation.' In L. Ganobs…
  26. 10.1057/9780230511958
  27. 10.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001
  28. 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00037-0
  29. 10.1017/CBO9780511486722
  30. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00341.x
  31. 10.1007/978-0-230-20858-2_10
  32. 10.3138/9781442683747
  33. 10.1386/ltss.1.1.9/0
  34. 10.4324/9780203463994
  35. 10.1515/9783110883527.457
CrossRef global citation count: 254 View in citation network →