Dissertation Acknowledgements: The Anatomy of a Cinderella Genre

Ken Hyland City University of Hong Kong

Abstract

Although sometimes considered to be only marginally related to the key academic goals of establishing claims and reputations, acknowledgements are commonplace in scholarly communication and virtually obligatory in dissertation writing. The significance of this disregarded “Cinderella” genre lies partly in the opportunities it offers students to present a social and scholarly self disentangled from academic discourse conventions and personally thank those who have shaped the accompanying text. Beyond the role it plays in academic gift giving and self-presentation, however, the textualization of gratitude reveals social and cultural characteristics, an intimation of disciplinary specialization within a broad generic structure. This analysis of the acknowledgements accompanying 240 Ph.D. and M.A. dissertations written by nonnative speakers of English suggests that personal gratitude is mediated by disciplinary preferences and strategic career choices, reflecting one way in which postgraduate writing represents a situated activity.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2003-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088303257276
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

References (27)

  1. Acknowledgements: Gratitude that grates [Editorial]. (1996). The Economist, 340, 83.
  2. Atkinson, D. (1999). Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The philosophical transactions of the R…
  3. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  4. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buc…
  5. 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90022-1
Show all 27 →
  1. 10.1086/jar.43.1.3630467
  2. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ…
  3. Caesar, T. (1992). On acknowledgements. New Orleans Review, 19(1), 85-94.
  4. Cohen, M., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge.
  5. Cronin, B. (1995). The scholar's courtesy: The role of acknowledgements in the primary communication process.…
  6. 10.1108/eb026909
  7. Cronin, B., McKenzie, G. & Stiffler, M. (1992). Patterns of acknowledgement. Journal of Documentation, 48(2),…
  8. 10.1108/eb026929
  9. Day, R. (1994). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
  10. 10.1007/BF02458396
  11. 10.1093/applin/23.1.1
  12. 10.1177/030631277700700112
  13. Hyland, K. (in press). Graduates' gratitude: The generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English …
  14. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
  15. 10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00003-6
  16. 10.1056/NEJM199111213252112
  17. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills,…
  18. Lester, J. D. (1993). Writing research papers (7th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
  19. 10.1177/016224399101600404
  20. Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah…
  21. Swales, J. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In E. Ventola & A. Maur…
  22. Swales, J. & Feak, C. (2000). English in today's research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor: University of Mi…