Abstract

The paper investigates whether contradictory arguments are less likely to be noticed when they are expressed implicitly rather than explicitly. It builds on the fact that—in natural language productions—contradictions are often not logical but rather—lato sensu—pragmatic in nature. The study presents an experiment using ecological and slightly modified material. In a Facebook post, Italian journalist Selvaggia Lucarelli conveyed two contradictory arguments through implicatures, presuppositions and vague expressions. This text was presented to experimental subjects: half read the original version, while the other half read a version in which the implicit content had been made explicit. Their responses to specific questions indicate that the contradiction is more easily noticed when it occurs between explicit assertions rather than between arguments that must be at least partially inferred. A strong effect is observed in relation to age and education differences among the groups. These results may provide experimental insight into the conditions under which argumentation flawed by contradictions may still achieve its intended effect, as if the contradiction were not present.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09686-9
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (63) · 2 in this index

  1. Bigi, Sarah, and Sara Greco Morasso. 2012. Keywords, frames and the reconstruction of material starting point…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  2. Bonevac, Daniel. 2003. Deduction: Introductory Symbolic Logic. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  3. Bonini, N., D. Osherson, R. Viale, and T. Williamson. 1999. On the psychology of vague predicates. Mind & Lan…
    Mind & Language  
  4. Brysbaert, Marc. 2019. How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutoria…
    Journal of Cognition  
  5. Christiansen, Morten, and Nick Chater. 2016. The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on languag…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  
Show all 63 →
  1. De Marneffe, Marie-Catherine. 2012. What’s that supposed to mean? Modeling the pragmatic meaning of utterance…
  2. De Saussure, Louis. 2013. Background relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 59: 178–189.
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  3. Dragos, Valentina. 2017. Detection of contradictions by relation matching and uncertainty assessment. Procedi…
    Procedia Computer Science  
  4. Dire et ne pas dire
  5. Erickson, Thomas D., and Mark E. Mattson. 1981. From words to meanings: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verba…
  6. Vague language explored
  7. Ferreira, Ademar. 2008. On the role of pragmatics, rhetoric and dialectic in scientific controversies. In Con…
  8. Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2008. Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (1): 20–29.
    Perspectives on Psychological Science  
  9. Givón, Talmy. 1982. Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language 61: 23–49.
    Studies in Language  
  10. Greco Morasso, Sara. 2012. Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: A case study in media argu…
    Discourse Studies  
  11. Grize, Jean Blaise, and Gilberte Piéraut-Le Bonniec. 1995. The uses of contradiction in argumentative discour…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  12. Fallacies
  13. Harabagiu, Sanda, Andrew Hickl and Finley Lacatusu. 2006. Negation, Contrast and Contradiction in Text Proces…
  14. Hornby, Peter A. 1974. Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1…
    Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior  
  15. Irwin, David E., J. Kathryn Bock, and Keith E. Stanovich. 1982. Effects of information structure cues on visu…
    Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior  
  16. L’Implicite
  17. Krebs, John R., and Richard Dawkins. 1984. Animal Signals: Mind-reading and Manipulation. In Behavioural Ecol…
  18. Lakoff, George. 1972. A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society…
    Chicago Linguistic Society Papers
  19. Langford, J., and V. M. Holmes. 1979. Syntactic presupposition in sentence comprehension. Cognition 7:363–383.
    Cognition  
  20. Lessl, Thomas M. 2008. Scientific demarcation and metascience. The national academy of sciences on greenhouse…
  21. Loftus, Elizabeth F. 1975. Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology 7:550–572.
    Cognitive Psychology  
  22. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. 1995. Tratti linguistici della persuasione in pubblicità. Lingua Nostra 2 (3): 41–51.
  23. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. 2009. La struttura informativa. Forma e funzione negli enunciati linguistici. Rom…
  24. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo and Viviana Masia. 2014. Implicitness Impact: Measuring texts. Journal of Pragmati…
  25. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. 2016. The “exaptation” of linguistic implicit strategies. SpringerPlus 5(1): 1–24.
  26. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. 2019. La lingua disonesta. Bologna, il Mulino.
  27. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. (2021) Manipulative Shallow Processing Induced by Presuppositions and Topics: The…
  28. Argumentation
  29. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton. 2013. Implicatures as forms of argument. In Perspectives on pragmatics…
  30. Mannaioli, Giorgia, Alessandro Ansani, Claudia Coppola, and Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri. 2024. Vagueness as an …
    Cognitive Processing  
  31. Mannaioli, Giorgia. 2025. Vagueness as an Implicitating Persuasive Strategy. John Benjamins.
  32. Mercier, Hugo. 2011. On the universality of argumentative reasoning. Journal of Cognition and Culture 11:85–113.
    Journal of Cognition and Culture  
  33. Mercier, Hugo. 2009. La Théorie Argumentative du Raisonnement. Ph.D. Thesis in Social Sciences, E.H.E.S.S, Paris.
  34. Mercuri, Chiara. 2023. Characterization frames constructing endoxa in activists’ discourse about the public c…
    Topoi  
  35. O’Keeffe, A., and W. Cheng. 2015. Vague language. In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. Karin Aijmer and Cris…
  36. Oswald, Steve. 2023. Pragmatics for argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 203:144–156.
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  37. Oswald, Steve, Didier Maillat, and Louis de Saussure. 2016. Deceptive and uncooperative verbal communication.…
  38. Oswald, Steve. 2018. Pragmatic Inference and Argumentative Inference. In Argumentation and Inference: Proceed…
  39. Reboul, Anne. 2011. A relevance-theoretic account of the evolution of implicit communication. Studies in Prag…
    Studies in Pragmatics
  40. Cognition and communication in the evolution of language
  41. Regner, Anna Carolina. 2008. Charles Darwin versus George Mivart. The role of polemics in science. In Controv…
  42. Rigotti, Eddo. 1988. Significato e senso. In AA.VV, Ricerche di semantica testuale. Brescia: La Scuola, 71–120.
  43. Inference in argumentation: a topics-based approach to argument schemes
  44. Russell, Bertrand. 1923. Vagueness. The Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 1 (2): 84–92.
    The Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy  
  45. Sbisà, Marina. 2021. Presupposition and implicature: Varieties of implicit meaning in explicitation practices…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  46. Sbisà, Marina. 2007. Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  47. Schwarz, Florian. 2016. False but slow: Evaluating statements with non-referring definites. Journal of Semant…
    Journal of Semantics
  48. Schwarz, Florian. 2015. Presuppositions vs. Asserted Content in Online Processing. In Experimental Perspectiv…
  49. Shmueli, D. 2008. Framing in geographical analysis of environmental conflicts: Theory, methodology and three …
    Geoforum  
  50. and Deirdre Wilson
  51. Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre W…
    Mind & Language  
  52. Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25:701–721.
    Linguistics and Philosophy  
  53. Strawson, Peter F. 1964. Identifying Reference and Truth-Values. Theoria 302: 96–118. Rep. in Idem. 1971. Log…
  54. The uses of argument
  55. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185 (415…
    Science  
  56. Argumentation
  57. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Bart Garssen, eds. 2008. Controversy and confrontation. John Benjamins Publishing …
  58. van Eemeren, Frans H. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectica…