Decoding Metadiscourse Markers in Estonian Academic Texts: A Language-Specific Perspective

Helen Hint University of Tartu ; Helena Lemendik University of Tartu ; Christer Johansson University of Bergen ; Djuddah A. J. Leijen University of Tartu

Abstract

This article presents the development of a specialized data set for analyzing Estonian metadiscourse markers in academic usage, extending Hyland's interpersonal metadiscourse model to a non–Indo-European language. Our goal is to show how metadiscourse, as a feature of a writing tradition, can reveal aspects of writing in languages other than English, complementing the traditionally Anglo-centric perspective in metadiscourse research. By analyzing 21 Estonian linguistics research articles, we offer a transparent procedure to address methodological issues in metadiscourse studies and demonstrate the need for language-specific adjustments in the framework. We introduce statistical methods for analyzing multidimensional associations among marker categories, linguistic level, and rhetorical text structure. The findings suggest that Hyland’s metadiscourse model can be adjusted for specific languages, highlighting the influence of language structure on metadiscourse category variation and linguistic expression levels. The study reinforces that the distribution and manifestation of metadiscourse are shaped, among other factors, by unique writing traditions.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883241286901
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Written Communication
Also cites 61 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1075/scl.24
  2. 10.35360/njes.218
  3. 10.1016/j.esp.2022.09.001
  4. 10.35360/njes.215
  5. 10.1057/9781137350466
  6. 10.4312/9789610603085
  7. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.097
  8. 10.1016/j.system.2019.02.010
  9. 10.4000/pratiques.1419
  10. 10.1002/asi.23367
  11. 10.15388/Klbt.2008.7591
  12. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.001
  13. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.007
  14. 10.1080/03610928008827940
  15. 10.1017/CBO9781139524599
  16. 10.1075/pbns.169
  17. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.004
  18. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004
  19. 10.1515/pjes-2016-0009
  20. 10.1075/pbns.148
  21. 10.1080/03075079.2019.1576165
  22. 10.1002/9781119306696
  23. 10.1075/hcp.43.17gly
  24. 10.5128/ERYa20.03
  25. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007
  26. 10.3998/mpub.6719
  27. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
  28. 10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001
  29. 10.1515/text-2021-0156
  30. 10.1093/applin/25.2.156
  31. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
  32. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.003
  33. 10.1080/00210862.2015.1026250
  34. 10.1177/1461445612471476
  35. 10.18637/jss.v025.i01
  36. 10.5128/ERYa20.07
  37. 10.3176/esa67.03
  38. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.003
  39. 10.1075/ijcl.13.4.05liu
  40. 10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I
  41. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.007
  42. 10.18637/jss.v017.i03
  43. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003
  44. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002
  45. 10.5209/clac.81305
  46. 10.1371/journal.pone.0205417
  47. 10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103561
  48. 10.54013/kk720a2
  49. 10.3176/esa63.09
  50. 10.1515/opli-2022-0231
  51. 10.1075/aals.18.03sin
  52. 10.29162/jez.2019.19
  53. 10.5128/ERYa17.15
  54. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
  55. 10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.002
  56. 10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.103
  57. 10.1524/stuf.2009.0005
  58. 10.1177/1461445609341006
  59. 10.54013/kk767a4
  60. 10.2307/357609
  61. 10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →