Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance

Ken Hyland University of Hong Kong ; Feng (Kevin) Jiang

Abstract

Successful research writers construct texts by taking a novel point of view toward the issues they discuss while anticipating readers’ imagined reactions to those views. This intersubjective positioning is encompassed by the term stance and, in various guises, has been a topic of interest to researchers of written communication and applied linguists for the past three decades. Recognizing that academic writing is less objective and “author evacuated” than Geertz and others once supposed, analysts have sought to identify the ways that writers use language to acknowledge and construct social relations as they negotiate agreement of their interpretations of data with readers. Despite prolonged and widespread curiosity concerning the notion of stance, however, together with an interest in the gradual evolution of research genres more generally, very little is known of how it has changed in recent years and whether such changes have occurred uniformly across disciplines. In this article we set out to explore these issues. Drawing on a corpus of 2.2 million words taken from the top five journals in each of four disciplines at three distinct time periods, we seek to determine whether authorial projection has changed in academic writing over the past 50 years.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2016-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088316650399
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (44) · 3 in this index

  1. Anthony L. (2011). AntConc 3.4.3. Retrieved from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.html
  2. Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The philosophical transactions of the Ro…
  3. Written Communication
  4. 10.1177/030631284014002001
  5. 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002223
Show all 44 →
  1. 10.1075/scl.23
  2. 10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93
  3. 10.1017/CBO9780511920776
  4. Longman grammar of spoken and written English
  5. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology
  6. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology
  7. 10.1093/applin/aml021
  8. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries
  9. International comparative performance of the UK research base—2011
  10. 10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00046-8
  11. Works and lives: The anthropologist as author
  12. Grabe W. (1984). Towards defining expository prose within a theory of text construction (Unpublished doctoral…
  13. 10.1057/9781137030825_2
  14. Greene M. (2013). History of the journal Nature. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nature/history/full/nat…
  15. Collected works of M. A. K. Halliday
  16. 10.1057/9780230274662
  17. 10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun
  18. Advances in written text analysis
  19. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.001.0001
  20. 10.1075/pbns.54
  21. Writing: Texts, processes and practices
  22. Disciplinary discourses
  23. Metadiscourse
  24. 10.1177/1461445605050365
  25. Disciplinary identities
  26. Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge
  27. 10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002
  28. English for Specific Purposes
  29. 10.1075/swll.5
  30. Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic applications
  31. Written Communication
  32. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0008
  33. 10.1057/9780230511910
  34. 10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7
  35. Mood and modality
  36. A comprehensive grammar of the English language
  37. 10.1075/jhp.14.1.03seo
  38. 10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00047-X
  39. Written Communication