Environmental Impact Communication: Cape Wind EIS, 2001–2015

Donald Ross University of Minnesota

Abstract

“Cape Wind” is a proposed wind-energy project off the Massachusetts coast. Its environmental effects are detailed in an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Writers of an EIS must address rhetorical challenges posed by the complexity of how the “environment” is characterized by many statutes and regulations. These requirements include guidance on the document’s style, and because the text is hundreds of pages long, they also include rules on its arrangement (its genre), and its online delivery. Partly as a result, the writer’s stance is that of an impersonal, corporate author. The EIS is required to address multiple audiences that include decision makers and elected officials; public participation in the process is encouraged. Evidence about the actual audience shows that the public finds out about the project through media reports, web sites, and press releases, rather than studying the EIS. Finally, sustained opposition by a fossil-fuel lobbying group has led to the project’s apparent demise.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2018-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281617706910
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (15)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 15 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  9. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  10. Written Communication
Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/07349165.1991.9725714
  2. 10.1201/9781420048551
  3. 10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00104-4
  4. 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.004
  5. 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00094-X
  6. 10.1007/BF02393798
  7. 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.06.003
  8. 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001
  9. 10.2307/1123648
  10. 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00036-6
  11. 10.2307/375964
  12. 10.1080/00335638209383600
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  13. 10.1080/14615517.2012.661557
  14. 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001
  15. 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.006
  16. Ross, D. & Rossen-Knill, D. (2016). Features of written argument. Argumentation, 30, 141–205.
  17. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
  18. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
  19. 10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00044-1
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →