Environmental Impact Communication: Cape Wind EIS, 2001–2015

Donald Ross University of Minnesota

Abstract

“Cape Wind” is a proposed wind-energy project off the Massachusetts coast. Its environmental effects are detailed in an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Writers of an EIS must address rhetorical challenges posed by the complexity of how the “environment” is characterized by many statutes and regulations. These requirements include guidance on the document’s style, and because the text is hundreds of pages long, they also include rules on its arrangement (its genre), and its online delivery. Partly as a result, the writer’s stance is that of an impersonal, corporate author. The EIS is required to address multiple audiences that include decision makers and elected officials; public participation in the process is encouraged. Evidence about the actual audience shows that the public finds out about the project through media reports, web sites, and press releases, rather than studying the EIS. Finally, sustained opposition by a fossil-fuel lobbying group has led to the project’s apparent demise.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2018-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281617706910
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (63) · 16 in this index

  1. How to do things with words
  2. Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy
  3. Written Communication
  4. Philosophy and Rhetoric
  5. 10.1080/07349165.1991.9725714
Show all 63 →
  1. 10.1201/9781420048551
  2. 10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00104-4
  3. Cape Wind, LLC. (2015). Retrieved from www.capewind.org.
  4. 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.004
  5. Clean Power Now. (2015). Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/company/clean-power-now.
  6. The environmental protection agency: Cleaning up America’s act
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives
  9. ESS Group, Inc. Environmental Consulting and Engineering Services. (2015). Cape Wind renewable energy project…
  10. Federal plain language guidelines. (2011). United States. Retrieved from http://www.plainlanguage.gov/index.cfm.
  11. Critical theory of technology
  12. Alternative modernity: The technical turn in philosophy and social theory
  13. 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00094-X
  14. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  15. 10.1007/BF02393798
  16. New York University Environmental Law Journal
  17. 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.06.003
  18. Technical Communication Quarterly
  19. Studies in the way of words
  20. Hanna, K. S. (Ed.). (2009). Environmental impact assessment: Practice and participation…
  21. Written Communication
  22. International Standards Organization. (2011). Environmental Management System ISO 14001.
  23. 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001
  24. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  25. 10.2307/1123648
  26. Technical Communication Quarterly
  27. Ecospeak: Rhetoric and environmental politics in America
  28. Written Communication
  29. 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00036-6
  30. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  31. The environmental protection agency: Structuring motivation in a green bureaucracy: The c…
  32. 10.2307/375964
  33. 10.1080/00335638209383600
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  34. 10.1080/14615517.2012.661557
  35. National Environmental Protection Policy Act of 1969. (1969). 42 USC §4321 ff.
  36. 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001
  37. Technical Communication Quarterly
  38. 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.006
  39. Argumentation
  40. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  41. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  42. Save Our Sound. (2015). Alliance to save Nantucket Bay . Retrieve…
  43. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
  44. Environmental Impact Assessment: Practice and participation
  45. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  46. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  47. Appropriate use of mitigation and monitoring and clarifying the appropriate use of mitiga…
  48. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
  49. United States, Council for Environmental Quality. (2005). Regulations for implementing …
  50. Federal Register
  51. United States, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. (2009). C…
  52. United States, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. (2014). C…
  53. United States, Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service. (2009). Cape Wi…
  54. United States, Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). Environmental Impact Statement …
  55. Corps of Engineers’ Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cape Wind Energy Project
  56. 10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00044-1
  57. Cape wind: Money, celebrity, class, politics, and the battle for our energy future on Nan…
  58. Journal of Business and Technical Communication