Features of Written Argument

Donald Ross University of Minnesota ; Deborah Rossen-Knill
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2016-05-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-015-9366-2
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. College English
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. Politeness: Some universals in language usage
  2. Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language and…
    Language and Society  
  3. Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluation criter…
    Qualitative Sociology  
  4. Hopper, Paul J. 2007. Linguistics and micro-rhetoric: A twenty-first century encounter. Journal of English Li…
    Journal of English Linguistics.  
  5. Hyland, Ken, and Polly Tse. 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25: 1…
    Applied Linguistics  
  6. Marcu, Daniel. 2000. Perlocutions: The Achilles’ Heel of speech act theory. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1719–1741.
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  7. Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167.
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  8. Ong, Walter J. 1975. The writer’s audience is always a fiction. PMLA 90: 9–20.
    PMLA  
  9. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language
  10. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…