The Report for Decision Making

Abstract

The report for decision making shares some common ground with the proposal, the report of scientific experiment, and even the persuasive essay, yet these genres differ. Recognizing these differences is necessary for effective inquiry, pedagogy, and decision making. The genres are means of solving different types of problems: practical, empirical, and theoretical. They serve different aims: action, demonstration, and conviction. The proposal, like the report, may solve practical problems, but the proposal advocates, whereas the report inquires. These genres all embody assumptions about problem solving and inquiry in their forms. Applying the problem-solving goals and methods of the proposal, experimental report, or essay to the report for decision making compromises the quality of the inquiry and of the resulting decision. Complex problems for decision making require a rhetorical method of inquiry based on Aristotle's special topics. The report genre reflects the invention heuristics and analysis in its form.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
1995-04-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651995009002002
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (11)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 11 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/377491
  2. 10.2307/358391
  3. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  4. 10.1109/TPC.1985.6448820
  5. 10.1109/47.7814
CrossRef global citation count: 17 View in citation network →