The Role of Technical Expertise in Engineering and Writing Teachers’ Evaluations of Students’ Writing

Written Communication Jan 2003

The Role of Technical Expertise in Engineering and Writing Teachers’ Evaluations of Students’ Writing

Summer Smith Clemson University

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which a teacher’s level of expertise in the subject of a technical paper affects the teacher’s reading and evaluation of it. Four engineering teachers and four writing teachers were asked to read aloud the same three student papers and to say aloud their thoughts as they read. The engineering teachers read papers on familiar and unfamiliar subjects. This method allowed direct comparison of the responses of (a) engineering teachers with relevant expertise in a paper’s subject, (b) engineering teachers without such expertise, and (c) writing teachers. The comparison indicates that technical expertise helps teachers evaluate validity and engage with the text but has a more ambiguous effect on evaluations of rhetorical appropriateness. The article also examines the teachers’ differing attitudes toward the importance of having technical expertise when evaluating and recommends approaches for teacher-training programs (in engineering and composition) based on the results.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2003-01-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088303253570
Open Access: Closed
Topics: affect and writing

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

Charney (2015)

Getting to “How Do You Know?” Rather Than “So What?” From “What's New?”

Technical Communication Quarterly
Schreibersdorf (2014)

Literary Discipline in the Margins

Pedagogy
Watts et al. (2012)

Pairing Courses Across the Disciplines

Written Communication
Taylor (2011)

“I Really Don't Know What He Meant by That”: How Well Do Engineering Students U…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Taylor (2007)

Comments on Lab Reports by Mechanical Engineering Teaching Assistants

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Show all 7 →

Cho et al. (2006)

Commenting on Writing

Written Communication
Taylor et al. (2006)

Ten Engineers Reading: Disjunctions between Preference and Practice in Civil En…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (13)

Dannels (2000)

Learning to Be Professional

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
HANSEN (2000)

Interactional Conflicts among Audience, Purpose, and Content Knowledge in the A…

Written Communication
HASWELL et al. (1999)

Context and Rhetorical Reading Strategies

Written Communication
Miller et al. (1998)

Responding to technical writing in an introductory engineering class: The role …

Technical Communication Quarterly
BLAKESLEE (1997)

Activity, Context, Interaction, and Authority

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Show all 13 →

SPACK (1997)

The Acquisition of Academic Literacy in a Second Language

Written Communication
RUDE (1995)

The Report for Decision Making

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Sperling (1994)

Constructing the Perspective of Teacher-as-Reader: A Framework for Studying Res…

Research in the Teaching of English
HAAS (1994)

Learning to Read Biology

Written Communication
Beason (1993)

Feedback and Revision in Writing across the Curriculum Classes

Research in the Teaching of English
JOHNS (1991)

Interpreting an English Competency Examination

Written Communication
Nelson (1990)

This Was an Easy Assignment: Examining How Students Interpret Academic Writing Tasks

Research in the Teaching of English
Rose (1980)

Rigid Rules, Inflexible Plans, and the Stifling of Language: A Cognitivist Anal…

College Composition and Communication

Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓

Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

↗
10.2307/359079

↗
10.2307/1423446

↗
10.2307/377036

↗
10.1093/elt/48.3.197

↗
10.2307/358669

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 15 View in citation network →