Responding to technical writing in an introductory engineering class: The role of genre and discipline

Paul Miller ; Jaye Bausser The Ohio State University ; Audeen Fentiman The Ohio State University

Abstract

A case study of an experienced professor's comments on a design report in a first‐year engineering class was conducted over the period of an academic year. When compared with the commenting styles of technical writing teachers, the engineering professor's comments were found to be highly directive, and thus at odds with the preference for facilitative comments that prevails in composition studies. However, differences in genre conventions explain much of the discrepancy.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
1998-09-01
DOI
10.1080/10572259809364641
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (6)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Rhetoric Review
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 6 →
  1. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 4 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/356714
  2. 10.2307/377036
  3. 10.2307/357622
  4. 10.2307/817882
CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →