Abstract

Text-based interviews that compared the teacher's intention for a given comment on an engineering student's paper with the student's understanding of the comment were used to examine the extent to which students understand the comments they receive and to determine the characteristics of comments that are well understood and those that are not. The teachers' comments analyzed in this study were fully understood only about half the time. Inclusion of a reason or explicit instructions helped students understand the comments.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2011-03-16
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2011.548762
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Pedagogy

Cites in this index (11)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Written Communication
Show all 11 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/3587804
  2. 10.2307/3588049
  3. 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
  4. Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback
    Journal of Second Language Writing  
  5. 10.1080/0270271870080404
  6. 10.17239/jowr-2009.01.02.2
  7. 10.2307/358669
  8. 10.2307/357622
CrossRef global citation count: 18 View in citation network →