IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jun 2019

Contradictory Comments: Feedback in Professional Communication Service Courses

Sara Doan University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

Abstract

Background: Professional communication instructors give profuse feedback on student writing in service or introductory courses; however, professional communication has traditionally borrowed feedback practices from first-year writing. In addition, professional communication instructors have relied on lore instead of data when giving students feedback. Literature review: Three recent studies examine the content of feedback comments given by professional communication instructors; nevertheless, these studies open questions about how professional communication instructors enact their pedagogical values when giving feedback. Research questions: 1. What do instructors value when teaching professional communication service courses? 2. What do instructors emphasize in their feedback? 3. To what extent do instructors' values align with the feedback that they give on students' writing? Research methodology: To answer these questions, this pilot study does close qualitative work to test interview questions and a coding scheme formed by inductive content analysis. I triangulated four interviews about instructors' pedagogical values with content analysis of their 599 feedback comments on students' writing. Results and discussion: The results reveal three implications: Rhetorical terminology may contradict the goals of professional communication, overly conversational or directive feedback may not give students tools to improve their writing, and borrowing pedagogical training from first-year composition may not prepare instructors to teach professional communication. Conclusion: Tensions between instructors' values and their feedback comments highlight a lack of consensus about professional communication's pedagogical values for the service course, particularly higher order values, such as audience analysis or purpose through giving feedback.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2019-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2019.2900899
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development professional writing book reviews editorial matter
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. Smith et al. (2025)
    Introducing TrackEDT: A Tool to Accelerate Empirical Editing Research
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Baker et al. (2025)
    Business Communication and Editing Students’ Evaluations of Written Error: An E…
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Gubala et al. (2025)
    Bringing the Technical and Professional Communication Service Course Back
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Axelrod (2025)
    Improving Proposal Writing by Looking to Information Operations
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Melonçon et al. (2024)
    Back to the Basics: Uncovering the Rhetoric Student Learning Outcome
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Show all 7 →
  1. Sonnenberg et al. (2024)
    Implementing a Continuous Improvement Model for Assignment Evaluation at the Te…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Doan (2021)
    Teaching Workplace Genre Ecologies and Pedagogical Goals Through Résumés and Co…
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

References (40) · 14 in this index

  1. kennedy (2007)
    Aristotle on Rhetoric A Theory of Civic Discourse
  2. lanham (2003)
    Analyzing Prose
  3. Northcut (2011)
    Insights from Illustrators: The Rhetorical Invention of Paleontology Representations
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Whittemore (2012)
    Immutable Mobiles Revisited: A Framework for Evaluating the Function of Ephemer…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. 10.1177/1049732305276687
     ↗
Show all 40 →
  1. Wolfe (2009)
    How Technical Communication Textbooks Fail Engineering Students
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. lunsford (2008)
    ‘Mistakes are a fact of life’: A national comparative study
    Coll Comp Commun
  3. spradley (1979)
    The Ethnographic Interview
  4. tracy (2013)
    Qualitative Research Methods Collecting Evidence Crafting Analysis Communicating Impact
  5. Bellwoar (2012)
    Everyday Matters: Reception and Use as Productive Design of Health-Related Texts
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. melonçon (2018)
    Critical postscript: On the future of the service course in technical and professional co…
    Program Perspect
  7. swales (2008)
    Genre Analysis English in Academic and Research Settings
  8. schreiber (2018)
    Guest editors’ introduction: Revisiting the service course to map out the future o…
    Program Perspect
  9. melonçon (2018)
    Empirical research in technical and professional communication: A 5-year examination of r…
    J Tech Writing Commun
  10. 10.7748/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214
     ↗
  11. 10.1080/00335638409383686
     ↗
  12. melonçon (2011)
    The current status of contingent faculty in technical and professional communication
    College Engl
  13. Veltsos (2017)
    Gamification in the Business Communication Course
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  14. Dannels et al. (2008)
    Critiquing Critiques: A Genre Analysis of Feedback Across Novice to Expert Desi…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  15. ilyasova (2014)
    Establishing an outcomes statement for technical communication
    Sharing Our Intellectual Traces Narrative Reflections from Administrators of Professional Technical and Scientific Communication Programs
  16. melonçon (2018)
    Programmatic locations in TPC
    Tek-Ritr
  17. Meloncon et al. (2016)
    A Portrait of Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in Technical and Professional Communicat…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  18. Anson et al. (2016)
    Students’ Perceptions of Oral Screencast Responses to Their Writing: Exploring …
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  19. wardle (2007)
    Teaching about writing, righting misconceptions: (re)envisioning ‘First-Year Compo…
    Coll Comp Commun
  20. Anderson et al. (2010)
    Peer Reviewing Across the Atlantic: Patterns and Trends in L1 and L2 Comments M…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  21. singleton (0)
    Introducing the feedback file for online course design in technical and professional comm…
  22. Tebeaux (2017)
    RETRACTED: Whatever Happened to Technical Writing?
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  23. Still (2006)
    Talking to Students: Embedded Voice Commenting as a Tool for Critiquing Student…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  24. swarts (2008)
    Together With Technology Writing Review Enculturation and Technological Mediation
  25. mackinnon (1993)
    Becoming a rhetor: Developing writing ability in amateur, writing-intensive organisations
    Writing in the Workplace New Research Perspectives
  26. Taylor (2011)
    “I Really Don't Know What He Meant by That”: How Well Do Engineering Students U…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  27. Lucas et al. (2015)
    The Competency Pivot: Introducing a Revised Approach to the Business Communicat…
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  28. Still et al. (2010)
    Listening to Students: A Usability Evaluation of Instructor Commentary
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  29. melonçon (2009)
    Topography of educational place(s): Technical communication, instructor preparedness, and…
    Content Management Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice
  30. bartholomae (1986)
    Inventing the university
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  31. melonçon (2014)
    Curricular challenges of emphasis degrees in technical and professional communication
    Sharing Our Intellectual Traces Narrative Reflections from Administrators of Professional Technical and Scientific Communication Programs
  32. elbow (1999)
    Sharing and Responding
  33. 10.2307/356689
     ↗
  34. 10.2307/378908
     ↗
  35. sommers (2006)
    Across the drafts
    Coll Comp Commun
CrossRef global citation count: 12 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Apr 2024
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism feminist rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy creative writing teacher development collaborative writing assessment technical communication professional writing grammar and mechanics literacy studies gender and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  2. The Peer Review Jun 2021
    Gentle Excavations: Mindfully Shifting to an Explicitly Antiracist Writing Center ↗
    Kristi Girdharry; Kristi Girdharry
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring professional writing multilingual writers grammar and mechanics race and writing gender and writing body and rhetoric book reviews editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy advanced composition creative writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions archival research multimodality artificial intelligence literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies literary studies editorial matter
  4. Pedagogy Apr 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism african american rhetorics cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing graduate education two-year college teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions digital rhetoric multimodality social media literacy studies race and writing gender and writing community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly Oct 2024
    Editors’ Use of Comprehensive Style Guides: The Case of Singular They ↗
    Jo Mackiewicz; Shaya Kraut; Allison Durazzi
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing digital rhetoric multilingual writers grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing public rhetoric editorial matter