Improving Proposal Writing by Looking to Information Operations

Abstract

This article examines the subject of persuasion in technical and professional communications (TPC) with a specific focus on proposals in U.S. Government contracting. It demonstrates a fundamental disconnect between the intent of proposals, which is to persuade, and the rhetorical traditions and professional boundaries of technical writers. The analysis draws on the existing rhetorical- and genre-based TPC literature and borrows from theory in other disciplines—management, organizational theory, sociology, and psychology among others. To advance the scholarship on proposals, this analysis is framed within the overall context of a structural analogy to U.S. military Information Operations (IO). Through use of analogy, it is suggested that the IO community's approach to the concepts of “influence,” “narrative,” “target audience,” and “unity of effort” may offer useful insight for State and Federal contractors to consider in their efforts to write persuasive proposals. This analysis is then used to develop a research agenda for the study of proposals. Areas for future research include the science of persuasion and the use of narrative as it relates to proposals, improved rigor in the use of target audience research, and organizational constructs to improve collaborative writing in proposals.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
10.1177/00472816241262231
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (19)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 19 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  8. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  9. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  10. Written Communication
  11. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  12. College Composition and Communication
  13. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  14. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 68 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.55540/0031-1723.3221
  2. Al Mestiraihi M. Becker K. (2022). Work-in-progress: Skill requirements for electrical and computer Engineers…
  3. 10.1080/08824090009388781
  4. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.05.004
  5. 10.1177/0896920518764586
  6. 10.1109/TPC.1983.6448683
  7. 10.1109/47.59086
  8. 10.1002/jee.20442
  9. 10.1111/1756-2171.12029
  10. 10.7591/9781501741326
  11. 10.4324/9781315250601-12
  12. 10.18260/1-2--1690
  13. 10.1073/pnas.1320645111
  14. 10.1177/1075547012454597
  15. De Silva N. H. Henderson P. (2007). Narrative-based writing for coherent technical documents. In Proceedings …
  16. 10.1109/TPC.2019.2900899
  17. Doan S. (2022). What Are We Really Teaching? Revisiting Technical and Professional Communications Pedagogical…
  18. Donnell J. A. Aller B. M. Alley M. Kedrowicz A. A. (2011). Why industry says that engineering graduates have …
  19. 10.1109/TPC.1980.6501886
  20. 10.1080/03043797.2021.1967883
  21. 10.1109/TPC.2021.3065854
  22. 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
  23. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45
  24. 10.4324/9781315224107
  25. 10.1109/TPC.2005.849646
  26. 10.1145/2775441.2775468
  27. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.08.001
  28. 10.1177/0956797611436349
  29. 10.3390/educsci11100641
  30. 10.1007/978-1-4684-0982-6
  31. 10.7771/2157-9288.1070
  32. 10.1002/9781119070269
  33. 10.1177/1468794107082305
  34. 10.1080/22054952.2023.2217042
  35. 10.2307/1423470
  36. 10.1177/0392192107087916
  37. 10.1177/0261927X18824859
  38. 10.1080/08850600590945434
  39. 10.1109/TPC.2017.2759619
  40. 10.2190/YD3E-5M7J-YX6M-3YL
  41. 10.1109/47.317481
  42. 10.2307/1179955
  43. 10.1177/030631277900900203
  44. 10.1126/science.265.5180.1921
  45. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.002
  46. 10.4324/9780203449233_chapter_1
  47. 10.1007/s10503-011-9242-7
  48. 10.1177/0021943603259582
  49. 10.1177/1056492618818023
  50. 10.1002/jee.20171
  51. 10.4324/9781410606884
  52. 10.1108/01437739610127450
  53. 10.1109/47.503272
  54. 10.1177/1080569912460400
  55. 10.1057/9780230625143
  56. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x
  57. 10.1177/074108830325
  58. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02207
  59. 10.4324/9781315835396
  60. 10.1558/wap.21707
  61. 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1996)12:5(20)
  62. 10.1177/0021886317703292
  63. 10.1108/EDI-01-2021-0028
  64. 10.1075/pbns.130.03vir
  65. 10.1002/jee.20159
  66. 10.1558/wap.v7i1.26246
  67. 10.1109/TPC.1980.6501907
  68. 10.3390/educsci12060420
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →