Improving Proposal Writing by Looking to Information Operations

Abstract

This article examines the subject of persuasion in technical and professional communications (TPC) with a specific focus on proposals in U.S. Government contracting. It demonstrates a fundamental disconnect between the intent of proposals, which is to persuade, and the rhetorical traditions and professional boundaries of technical writers. The analysis draws on the existing rhetorical- and genre-based TPC literature and borrows from theory in other disciplines—management, organizational theory, sociology, and psychology among others. To advance the scholarship on proposals, this analysis is framed within the overall context of a structural analogy to U.S. military Information Operations (IO). Through use of analogy, it is suggested that the IO community's approach to the concepts of “influence,” “narrative,” “target audience,” and “unity of effort” may offer useful insight for State and Federal contractors to consider in their efforts to write persuasive proposals. This analysis is then used to develop a research agenda for the study of proposals. Areas for future research include the science of persuasion and the use of narrative as it relates to proposals, improved rigor in the use of target audience research, and organizational constructs to improve collaborative writing in proposals.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
10.1177/00472816241262231
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (219) · 32 in this index

  1. 48 CFR §15.303 (2023). https://www.acquisition.gov/far/15.303
  2. 10.55540/0031-1723.3221
  3. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2004). Sustaining the Change: A Follow-up Report …
  4. Al Mestiraihi M. Becker K. (2022). Work-in-progress: Skill requirements for electrical and computer Engineers…
  5. 10.1080/08824090009388781
Show all 219 →
  1. American Anthropological Association. (2009). Final Report on the Army’s Human Terrain System Proof of Concep…
  2. Metaphor and knowledge
  3. Powerful proposals: How to give your business the winning edge
  4. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.05.004
  5. Baker J. A. (2011). And the Winner Is: How Principles of Cognitive Science Resolve the Plain Language Debate.…
  6. 10.1177/0896920518764586
  7. Barton B. Barton M. (1981). Ethos persona and role confusion in engineering. In J. C. Mathes & T. E. Pinelli …
  8. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science
  9. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  10. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  11. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  12. Toward a rhetoric of technical proposals: Ethos and audience analysis
    Technical Communication
  13. 10.1002/jee.20442
  14. 10.1111/1756-2171.12029
  15. 10.7591/9781501741326
  16. Beyond storytelling
    Æther: A Journal of Strategic Airpower & Spacepower
  17. Bloomberg Government. (2023). Five Trends in Government Contracting for FY 2023. https://about.bgov.com/brief…
  18. Bohan M. (2011). They come in wearing their rank: The dynamics of an inter-professional proposal writing team…
  19. Bratten J. L. (2001). Negotiating between conflicting discourse communities: Scientists writing technical mar…
  20. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  21. US engineering in a global economy
  22. College Composition and Communication
  23. Bureau of Labor and Statistics. (2023). Occupational Outlook Handbook. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/media-and-comm…
  24. An alternative framework for agent recruitment: From MICE to RASCLS
    Studies in Intelligence
  25. Cabayan H. (2018). Executive Summary. SMA White Paper. What Do Others Think and How Do We Know What They Are …
  26. Storytelling and terrorism: Towards a comprehensive ‘counter-narrative strategy’
    Strategic Insights
  27. Research projects and research proposals
  28. Influence: Science & practice
  29. Cihacek B. (2020) Mitigating Cognitive Bias Proposal. National Contract Management Association. https://ncmah…
  30. Does popular management literature lead managers up the linguistic garden path? A compari…
    HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business
  31. Guiding the reader: Proposals and persuasion
    Technical Communication
  32. Collaborative considerations for corporate writers: Insights from the academy and the cor…
    Proceedings of the Conference on Corporate Communication
  33. Proceedings of the 44th Sefi Annual Conference
  34. 10.4324/9781315250601-12
  35. Cooper L. (n.d.). What is the Cost to Prepare a Proposal? https://www.ociwins.com/government-proposal-consult…
  36. 10.18260/1-2--1690
  37. Toward military design: Six ways the JP 5-0’s operational design falls short
    Joint Force Quarterly
  38. 10.1073/pnas.1320645111
  39. 10.1177/1075547012454597
  40. Shaping the ‘information space’
    Journal of Information Warfare
  41. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  42. Defense Acquisition University (DAU). Who Should Be Present at Vendor Meetings? Can Divisions Meet/ Or Conduc…
  43. DeGennaro P. Munch R. (2018). Coordinating Operations to Influence Behaviors in the OE. SMA White Paper. What…
  44. Deltek. (2023a). Deltek clarity 2023: Government contracting industry study. https://www.deltek.com/en/govern…
  45. Deltek. (2023b). 2023 SLED government contracting forecast. https://info.deltek.com/2023-SLED-Government-Cont…
  46. Information warfare and security
  47. Department of Defense. Vendor Communication Plan. https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/pgi/docs/DoD_Vendor_Commu…
  48. Department of Defense. (2016). Department of defense strategy for operations in the information environment. …
  49. De Silva N. H. Henderson P. (2007). Narrative-based writing for coherent technical documents. In Proceedings …
  50. Business is war: Military literature and strategic management’s future
    Rutgers Business Review
  51. de Souza Almeida L. M. (2019). Understanding industry’s expectations of engineering communication skills [Unp…
  52. de Souza Almeida L. M. Becker K. H. Villanueva Alarcón I. (2019) Board 40: Understanding Industry’s Expectati…
  53. DiEuliis D. Giordano J. (2018). Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Self-Disclosure. SMA White Paper. What Do Others…
  54. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  55. Doan S. (2022). What Are We Really Teaching? Revisiting Technical and Professional Communications Pedagogical…
  56. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  57. Donnell J. A. Aller B. M. Alley M. Kedrowicz A. A. (2011). Why industry says that engineering graduates have …
  58. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  59. Collaboration and concepts of authorship
    PMLA
  60. English Language & Usage. (n.d.). What is the history of the phrase ‘hot button’ as in ‘hot button issues’? h…
  61. Federal Acquisition Institute. (n.d.). GreenDots Best Practices in Technical Evaluation Boards /PANELS (p. 7)…
  62. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). (2023). https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far
  63. 10.1080/03043797.2021.1967883
  64. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  65. Fosher K. (2021) Ethical Questions about Who Counts as an “Anthropologist” in Military Organizations. Posted …
  66. Writing winning business proposals
  67. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  68. Friedland J. (2012). Philosophy is Not Science. New York Times. https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs…
  69. 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
  70. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45
  71. Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines
  72. 10.4324/9781315224107
  73. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  74. Government Accountability Office. (2022a). A Snapshot of Government-wide Contracting for FY 2021 (Interactive…
  75. Information environment: Opportunities and threats to DOD’s national security mission
  76. Contested information environment: Actions needed to strengthen education and training fo…
  77. Gross A. Hamlin A Merck B. Rubio C. Naas J. Savage M. DeSilva M. (2017). Technical Writing. Open Oregon. http…
  78. Grynkewich A. G. Cabayan H. Jones R. C. Thomson S. K. Meredith S. B.III Seese G. S. Linera R. E. McQuagge E. …
  79. 10.1145/2775441.2775468
  80. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.08.001
  81. The rhetoric of the grant proposal
    Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly
  82. HigherGov. (2023). Small Businesses Awarded Record $159 Billion from Federal Government in 2022. https://www.…
  83. 10.1177/0956797611436349
  84. 10.3390/educsci11100641
  85. Hoffeld D. (n.d.). The Difference Between Persuasion & Manipulation. https://www.hoffeldgroup.com/wp-content/…
  86. 10.1007/978-1-4684-0982-6
  87. 10.7771/2157-9288.1070
  88. Writing proposals
  89. Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2014). JP 3-13 Information Operations incorporating change 1 November 20 2014. Washin…
  90. Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2017). JP 1 Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States. Washington DC. https:…
  91. Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2018). Joint concept for operating in the information environment (JCOIE). Washington…
  92. Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2022). JP 3-04 Information in Joint Operations. Washington DC.
  93. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  94. Inform or persuade? An analysis of technical communication textbooks
    Technical Communication
  95. Funded research-getting started
    Engineering Education
  96. Communication trends in engineering firms: Implications for undergraduate engineering courses
    International Journal of Engineering Education
  97. The influence of military strategies on business planning
    International Journal of Business and Management
  98. Bridging boundaries, negotiating differences: The nature of leadership in cross-functiona…
    Technical Communication
  99. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  100. Division of labor or integrated teams: A Crux in the management of technical communication?
    Technical Communication
  101. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  102. Writing for dollars, writing to please
    The Scribes Journal of Legal Writing
  103. A theory of discourse: The aims of discourse
  104. 10.1002/9781119070269
  105. Engineering communication
  106. Kraicer J. (1997). The Art of Grantsmanship. https://www.sciencegateway.org/resources/pdf/1.pdf
  107. Technical communication
  108. Foundations of effective influence operations: A framework for enhancing army capabilities
  109. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  110. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  111. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  112. 10.1177/1468794107082305
  113. 10.1080/22054952.2023.2217042
  114. Loopio (2023). 2023 RFP trends & benchmarks. https://loopio.com/trends-report/
  115. Technical and business communication: Bibliographic essays for teachers and corporate trainers
  116. ManTech (n.d.). DecisionPoint. Microsoft AppSource. https://appsource.microsoft.com/en-us/product/web-apps/ma…
  117. Developing, disseminating, and assessing command narrative: Anchoring command efforts on …
  118. Developing, disseminating, and assessing command narrative: Anchoring command efforts on …
  119. 10.2307/1423470
  120. 10.1177/0392192107087916
  121. 10.1177/0261927X18824859
  122. 10.1080/08850600590945434
  123. Technical and business communication: Bibliographic essays for teachers and corporate trainers
  124. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  125. Maxwell R. Dickman R. (2007). The Elements of Persuasion. EE. UU. http://in2in.org/od/thought/March%202008%20…
  126. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  127. 10.2190/YD3E-5M7J-YX6M-3YL
  128. McGovern A. C. (2020). Proposal Development Patterns and Practices in the Academic Research Community [Unpubl…
  129. Howdy or hello? Technical and professional communication
  130. Rhetorical moves in scientific proposal writing: A case study from biochemical engineering
  131. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  132. Critical postscript: On the future of the service course in technical and professional co…
    Programmatic Perspectives
  133. 10.2307/1179955
  134. 10.1177/030631277900900203
  135. 10.1126/science.265.5180.1921
  136. Technical and business communication: Bibliographic essays for teachers and corporate trainers
  137. Mourshed M. Farrell D. Barton D. (2012). Education to Employment: Designing a System That Works. Mckinsey Cen…
  138. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.002
  139. A fragile power: Scientists and the state
  140. 10.4324/9780203449233_chapter_1
  141. Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge
  142. A decadal survey of the social and behavioral sciences: A research agenda for advancing i…
  143. Writing: A ticket to work … or a ticket out: A survey of business leaders
  144. National Commission on Writing (NCW) in America’s Schools and Colleges. (2003). The Neglected “R”: The Need f…
  145. Written Communication
  146. Office of the Secretary of Defense. (2022). Military Information Support Operations Operation and Maintenance…
  147. (FY) 2023 Budget Estimate. https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2023/budget_justi…
  148. Office of the Secretary of Defense. (2023). Military Information Support Operations Operation and Maintenance…
  149. (FY) 2024 Budget Estimate. https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2024/budget_justi…
  150. Argumentation
  151. Persuasion: Theory and practice
  152. Information operations and public affairs: A union of influence
  153. OST Global Solutions. (n.d.). Influence the RFP by Shaping the Requirements. https://www.ostglobalsolutions.c…
  154. 10.1177/0021943603259582
  155. Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings
  156. 10.1177/1056492618818023
  157. Passantino L. B. (2021). Successful failures and failed successes: Untangling the obstacles facing collaborat…
  158. 10.1002/jee.20171
  159. Pate D. L. (2020). The Skills Companies Need Most In 2020—And How to Learn Them. LinkedIn The learning blog. …
  160. Planning ethical influence operations: A framework for defense information professionals
  161. The language of inform, influence, and persuade: Assessment Lexicon and usage guide for U…
  162. Desk reference.
  163. 10.4324/9781410606884
  164. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge
  165. Porter M. (2001). Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review. https://www.academia.edu/download/60957…
  166. Why academics have a hard time writing good grant proposals
    Journal of Research Administration
  167. 10.1108/01437739610127450
  168. Public Relations Society of America. (2005). Telling the Truth Especially in War Time. Professional Standards…
  169. Cultural knowledge for intelligence analysts: Expertise in cultural sensemaking
    American Intelligence Journal
  170. Rast M. (2023). Writing for the biggest customer in the world: Efficiencies and inefficiencies in proposal wr…
  171. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  172. 10.1177/1080569912460400
  173. Structuring effective technical reports
    Technical Communication
  174. Sales H. E. (2002). Engineering texts: A study of a community of aerospace engineers their writing practices …
  175. 10.1057/9780230625143
  176. Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology
  177. Schryer C. (1994). The lab vs. the clinic: Sites of competing genres. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.) Genre…
  178. The rhetoric and ideology of genres
  179. An analysis of conceptual metaphor in the professional and academic discourse of technica…
  180. Shipley Associates. (n.d.a). Shipley Business Development Lifecycle. http://sbdl.shipleywins.com/
  181. Shipley Associates. (n.d.b). Working out the Kinks by Addressing Hot Buttons. https://www.shipleywins.com/blo…
  182. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x
  183. Technical and business communication: Bibliographic essays for teachers and corporate trainers
  184. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  185. Technical Communication Quarterly
  186. The need for intelligence community sponsored influence research. Submitted to the commit…
  187. 10.1177/074108830325
  188. Using target audience analysis to aid strategic level decisionmaking
  189. Theohary C. A. (2022). Defense Primer: Information Operations. Congressional Research Service 14. IF10771 Ver…
  190. Thomson S. K. (2018). Empathy: The (missing) foundation of effective operational art. SMA White Paper. What d…
  191. War and anti-war: Survival at the Dawn of the 21st Century
  192. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02207
  193. Tsipursky G. (2022). The Danger of Bias n Bid Procurements and Contract Awards. Forbes. https://www.forbes.co…
  194. 10.4324/9781315835396
  195. U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2000). Occupational Outlook Handbook. https://www.bls.g…
  196. The DP professional's guide to writing effective technical communications
  197. Writing and Pedagogy
  198. Structured process for information campaign evaluation (SPICE): An analytic framework, kn…
  199. 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1996)12:5(20)
  200. 10.1177/0021886317703292
  201. 10.1108/EDI-01-2021-0028
  202. 10.1075/pbns.130.03vir
  203. 10.1002/jee.20159
  204. Writing and Pedagogy
  205. How do you define a problem like influence?
    Journal of Information Warfare
  206. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  207. 10.3390/educsci12060420
  208. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  209. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  210. Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education
  211. Technical Communication Quarterly
  212. Wright N. (2018). The Neuroscience Psychology and Practice of Target Audience Self-Report. SMA White Paper. W…
  213. Yager M. (Ed.). (2018). SMA White Paper: What Do Others Think and How Do We Know What They Are Thinking. A St…
  214. Technical and business communication: Bibliographic essays for teachers and corporate tra…