Persuasiveness and Audience Focus in a Nonacademic R&D Setting

Abstract

Participants in a qualitative case study of nonacademic R&D authors were uncomfortable with the idea of persuasion in their writing. The participants thought their reports were more informative than persuasive. Three definitions for “persuasion” emerged: discourse intended to push a reader toward an action; discourse written in a clear, compelling style; and shady, manipulative discourse. When asked whether they owed a greater debt to their audience or to their subject matter, most participants chose subject matter. However, some participants argued that my question posed a false dichotomy, in that serving subject matter was the best way to serve audience.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1996-01-01
DOI
10.2190/r60h-a8by-m8uq-h08l
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. College English
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/376723
  2. 10.2307/358092
  3. 10.2307/358094
  4. 10.2307/358093
  5. 10.4135/9781412985659
  6. 10.2307/375964
  7. 10.1177/108056999305600319
  8. 10.1177/002194368602300102
  9. 10.2190/NET
  10. 10.2307/376441
  11. 10.2307/377789
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →