Proposal Pitfalls Plaguing Researchers: Can Technical Communicators Make a Difference?

Steve Lemanski Utah State University

Abstract

The facts bear out that the odds are against most scientific researchers and scholars—especially those just starting out—in their attempts to win funding for their research projects through their grant proposals. In this article, the author takes a close look at some of the proposal-related problems and pitfalls that have historically challenged scholarly grant seekers. The intellectual prowess and specialized training of academics can sometimes be their downfall, when it comes to persuading government agencies and foundations to fund their well conceived, but unconvincingly presented projects. In examining numerous studies, surveys, and insightful articles of experts in the genre of the research grant proposal, it becomes evident that technical communicators could quickly become the best friends of scholars, when the former harness the rhetorical and stylistic skills that are almost instinctive to them, and apply them to writing grant proposals, a task which is all too often a disappointing exercise for the latter.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2014-04-01
DOI
10.2190/tw.44.2.f
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 4 works outside this index ↓
  1. Proposal Planning and Writing
  2. 10.1002/tea.20008
  3. 10.1177/030631277900900203
  4. 10.1109/47.317481
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →