Feedback From Internship Mentors in Technical Communication Internships

Elisabeth Kramer-Simpson New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

Abstract

Documenting and characterizing interactions between student interns and their mentors in the workplace offers perspective on student learning and enculturation that can help us introduce these ways of learning to students in the technical communication classroom, even before the internship. Three student intern conversations in the internship setting are the focus of this close discourse analysis, framed by 6-month-long case studies and Vygotsky’s learning theory. Results indicate that many similarities exist between classroom feedback and mentor feedback in the internship, but that differences in student agency may make negotiation important in the technical communication classroom.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2018-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281617728362
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (13)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 13 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Research in the Teaching of English
  6. Research in the Teaching of English
  7. Written Communication
  8. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80126-X
  2. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
  3. 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.012
  4. 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.013
  5. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.002
  6. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
  7. 10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00019-2
  8. 10.1177/1080569909336450
  9. 10.2307/357622
  10. 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.006
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →