Abstract

Many engineering undergraduates receive their first and perhaps most intensive exposure to engineering communication through writing lab reports in lab courses taught by graduate teaching assistants (TAs). Most of the TAs' teaching of writing happens through their comments on students' lab reports. Technical writing faculty need to be aware of TAs' response practices so they can build on or counteract that instruction as needed. This study examines the response practices of two TAs and the ways the practices shifted after the TAs began using a grading rubric. The analysis reveals distinct patterns in focus and mode, some reflecting best practices and some not. It also indicates encouraging changes after the TAs started using the grading rubric. The TAs' marginalia became more content focused and specific and, perhaps most important, less authoritative and more likely to reflect a coaching mode. The article concludes with implications for technical writing courses.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2007-10-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651907304024
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (24) · 8 in this index

  1. What do assistant professors want
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Cohen, A.D. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions . In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Le…
  4. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 24 →
  1. Huot, B. (1993). The influence of holistic scoring procedures on reading and rating student essays. In M. Wil…
  2. Mayleth, B. (1998). Do we do what we say? Contradictions in composition and grading. In F. Zak & C. C. Weaver…
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. 2000 national doctoral program survey
  5. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00346.x
  6. Journal of the Council of Writing Program Administration
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00274.x
  9. Written Communication
  10. Technical Communication Quarterly
  11. 10.2307/357622
  12. College Composition and Communication
  13. Twelve readers reading: Responding to college student writing
  14. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  15. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1994.tb00134.x
  16. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00624.x
  17. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00476.x
  18. Proceedings: 1991 Frontiers in Education Conference
  19. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00753.x