Abstract

Drawing on public comments and drafts of an environmental impact statement, this article examines public participation in policy making via the federal Web site Regulations.gov . Aiming to be our “voice” in federal decision making, Regulations.gov encourages citizens to submit comments on proposed actions. Drawing on Callon, Lascoumes, and Barthe’s “hybrid forum,” the author suggests that ethical and effective participatory policy making should be hybrid in scope, inclusion, and agency. While public participation in policy making is commonly positioned as an antidote to the crisis of trust in science, the author argues that such participation gone wrong could have off-target impacts, raising questions about the promise of Regulations.gov .

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2020-01-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651919874114
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly

References (35) · 8 in this index

  1. About us. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.regulations.gov/aboutProgram
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0175643
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Bradley K. (2017). A final report on dicamba-injured soybean acres. Integrated Pest and Crop Management. Retr…
  5. Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy
Show all 35 →
  1. Charles D. (2017, October 26). Monsanto attacks scientists after studies show trouble for weedkiller dicamba.…
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Dewey C. (2017, August 29). This miracle weed killer was supposed to save farms, instead, it’s devastating th…
  4. 10.1177/0963662515603271
  5. 10.1002/ps.4652
  6. Issues in Science and Technology
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. Hakim D. (2017, September 21). Monsanto’s weed killer, dicamba, divides farmers. The New York Times. Retrieve…
  9. 10.1080/10440046.2011.562068
  10. The paradox of American democracy: Elites, special interests, and the betrayal of public trust
  11. Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America
  12. Ecospeak: Rhetoric and environmental politics in America
  13. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  14. Lipton E. (2017, November 1). Crops in 25 states damaged by unintended drift of weed killer. The New York Tim…
  15. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  16. Monsanto Co. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement for determin…
  17. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  18. 10.7208/chicago/9780226595221.001.0001
  19. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement for determination of nonregulated status of her…
  20. Plant Protection Act, Pub. L. 106-224, 114 Stat. 438, codified as amended at 7 U.S.C. § 7701 (2000).
  21. Public comments make a difference. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.regulations.gov/docs/FactSheet_Public_C…
  22. Indian Journal of Agronomy
  23. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  24. Participation and power: Civic discourse in environmental policy decisions
  25. College Composition and Communication
  26. Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society
  27. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2014a). Monsanto petitions (10-188-01p and 12-185-01p) for determinations of…
  28. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2014b). Monsanto petitions (10-188-01p and 12-185-01p) for determinations of…
  29. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2014c). Monsanto petitions (10-188-01p and 12-185-01p) for determinations of…
  30. Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America