The Rhetoric and Politics of Science in the Case of the Missouri River System

Margaret Baker Graham ; Neil Lindeman San Francisco State University

Abstract

Two versions of a biological opinion written by different teams in the U.S. Fish and Wild-life Service illuminate how different rhetorical strategies reflect different values. The historical narrative in the earlier biological opinion, which is used to argue for vigorous action to protect endangered species along the Missouri River, is largely erased in the later opinion that privileges human uses of the river system. This analysis emphasizes the problematic nature of authorship when the concept is applied to a document produced in an organization or agency. Moreover, examining how authors control information reveals the power technical writers have to influence meaning making.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2005-10-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651905278311
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/105065198800200103
  2. 10.1177/016224398400900106
  3. 10.2307/2393235
  4. 10.1088/0963-6625/5/3/001
  5. 10.1177/016224398400900114
  6. 10.1177/0957926502013003054
  7. 10.1126/science.299.5607.625
  8. 10.1088/0963-6625/2/4/009
  9. 10.1515/9781400857869
  10. 10.4324/9780203207994
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →