Abstract

This essay develops a conception of science as a complex series of cultural practices mediated in and through discourse. This conception requires attention to discourses typically considered non‐scientific, such as those resulting in funding decisions. A case study of the cold fusion controversy demonstrates that internal scientific practices cannot explain adequately the eventual closure of the debate, and that we must look to the rhetorical practices of Congressional committees and government agencies for those explanations.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
1994-01-01
DOI
10.1080/10572259409364558
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 22 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/03085148900000007
  2. 10.1080/00335637409383222
  3. 10.1080/00335638609383782
  4. Too Hot to Handle: The Race for Cold Fusion
  5. 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1983.tb00697.x
  6. 10.1080/03637758109376063
  7. 10.1016/0022-0728(89)80006-3
  8. 10.1016/0022-0728(89)80141-X
  9. 10.1038/339667a0
  10. 10.2307/2095325
  11. 10.1525/rh.1991.9.4.283
  12. 10.1007/BF00173966
  13. 10.1016/0022-0728(89)85087-9
  14. 10.1080/00335639009383910
  15. 10.1017/S0269889700001083
  16. 10.1525/rh.1991.9.4.301
  17. 10.1525/rh.1989.7.1.101
  18. 10.1080/03085148900000011
  19. 10.1177/030631290020003008
  20. Science as Practice and Culture
  21. 10.1080/03637759109376238
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2929
CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →