Cold fusion and the sociology of scientific knowledge

Trevor Pinch Cornell University

Abstract

The early stages of the cold fusion controversy are reviewed. It is shown how ideas in the sociology of scientific knowledge such as “symmetry,”; “interpretative flexibility,”; and “experimenter's regress”; are applicable to the controversy. It is argued that there is nothing exceptional about the dynamics of the debate, apart from the media attention. In cold fusion we see scientific controversy as normal.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
1994-01-01
DOI
10.1080/10572259409364559
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (15) · 1 in this index

  1. Knowledge and Social Imagery
  2. “Cold‐Fusion Claim Is Faulted on Ethics as Well as Science.”
    New York Times
  3. Too Hot to Handle: The Race for Cold Fusion
  4. Knowledge and Controversy. Spec. issue of Social Studies of Science
  5. Changing Order
Show all 15 →
  1. The Social Dimensions of Science
  2. Unpublished essay, 1992.Latour, Bruno Science in Action
  3. 10.1086/368708
  4. Fire from Ice
  5. 10.1177/030631285015001001
  6. Confronting Nature: The Sociology of Solar‐'Neutrino Detection
  7. “The Role of Scientific Communities in the Development of Science.”
    Impact of Science on Society
  8. Paper presented at the conference on Rhetoric and Science
  9. Leviathan and the Air‐pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life
  10. Technical Communication Quarterly