Transmuting Common Substances

Journal of Business and Technical Communication Oct 1995

BRAD THACKER ; JAMES F. STRATMAN

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between forensic, deliberative, and epideictic modes of rhetoric in the cold fusion controversy. The purpose of this exploration is threefold: (a) to show the interactions between these three modes of rhetoric more comprehensively than they have been shown in previous case studies of scientific controversies; (b) to examine the ways in which all three modes have shaped the emerging scientific consensus and, further, through a close analysis of key experimental reports, to reveal how forensic rhetoric in the cold fusion controversy has come to occupy pride of place; and (c) to suggest how the events in this controversy support Robert Sanders's contention that rhetorical practices interact with scientific practices to allow diverse researchers to arrive at constructive agreements—not merely political ones—on both research findings and ways to resolve competing interpretations.

Journal: Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published: 1995-10-01
DOI: 10.1177/1050651995009004001
Open Access: Closed
Topics: rhetorical theory multimodality multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

Jackson (2010)

Whatever Happened to the Cephalic Index? The Reality of Race and the Burden of Proof

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Zerbe et al. (1998)

The Rhetoric of Fraud in Breast Cancer Trials: Manifestations in Medical Journa…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (8)

Pinch (1994)

Cold fusion and the sociology of scientific knowledge

Technical Communication Quarterly
Gross (1993)

Experiment as text: The limits of literary analysis

Rhetoric Review
THOMPSON (1993)

Arguing for Experimental “Facts” in Science

Written Communication
SULLIVAN (1991)

The Epideictic Rhetoric of Science

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Winsor (1990)

The Construction of Knowledge in Organizations: Asking the Right Questions abou…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Show all 8 →

FAHNESTOCK et al. (1988)

The Stases in Scientific and Literary Argument

Written Communication
FAHNESTOCK (1986)

Accommodating Science

Written Communication
MYERS (1985)

The Social Construction of Two Biologists' Proposals

Written Communication

Also cites 18 works outside this index ↓

Crawford, Mark (1989)

10.1126/science.244.4904.522

Science ↗
10.1021/cen-v067n017.p004

↗
10.1021/cen-v067n014.p004

↗
10.1021/cen-v067n018.p006

↗
10.1016/0022-0728(89)80006-3

↗
10.2307/356373

↗
10.2307/357680

↗
10.1080/10417949209372863

↗
10.1126/science.244.4906.753

↗
10.1038/340525a0

↗
10.1080/15295039009360159

↗
10.1038/338701a0

↗
10.1086/286513

↗
Morrison, Douglas R. O. (1990)

10.1088/2058-7058/3/2/29

Physics World ↗
Pool, Robert (1989)

10.1126/science.244.4903.420.a

Science ↗
Pool, Robert (1989)

10.1126/science.244.4905.647

Science ↗
10.1038/342375a0

↗
10.1021/cen-v067n020.p005a

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →