Abstract

This study explores the relationship between forensic, deliberative, and epideictic modes of rhetoric in the cold fusion controversy. The purpose of this exploration is threefold: (a) to show the interactions between these three modes of rhetoric more comprehensively than they have been shown in previous case studies of scientific controversies; (b) to examine the ways in which all three modes have shaped the emerging scientific consensus and, further, through a close analysis of key experimental reports, to reveal how forensic rhetoric in the cold fusion controversy has come to occupy pride of place; and (c) to suggest how the events in this controversy support Robert Sanders's contention that rhetorical practices interact with scientific practices to allow diverse researchers to arrive at constructive agreements—not merely political ones—on both research findings and ways to resolve competing interpretations.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
1995-10-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651995009004001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (66) · 8 in this index

  1. The Rhetoric and Poetics of Aristotle
  2. Shaping Written Knowledge
  3. Blakeslee, Ann M. “Inventing Scientific Discourse: Dimensions of Rhetorical Knowledge in Physics.” Diss. Carn…
  4. Knowledge and Social Imagery
  5. The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse
Show all 66 →
  1. Understanding Scientific Prose
  2. Too Hot to Handle: The Race for Cold Fusion
  3. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice
  4. 10.1126/science.244.4904.522
    Science  
  5. New York Times Magazine
  6. The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse
  7. Rhetoric in the Human Sciences
  8. Chemical and Engineering News
  9. 10.1021/cen-v067n017.p004
  10. Chemical and Engineering News
  11. 10.1021/cen-v067n014.p004
  12. 10.1021/cen-v067n018.p006
  13. New York Times
  14. Written Communication
  15. Argument in Transition
  16. Written Communication
  17. Oldspeak/Newspeak: Rhetorical Transformations
  18. 10.1016/0022-0728(89)80006-3
  19. The Social Dimensions of Science
  20. Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse
  21. “Building Neo-Aristotelian Theory: The Cold-Fusion Controversy as a Test Case.”
  22. Pretext
  23. Rhetoric Review
  24. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy
  25. The Rhetorical Idiom: Essays in Rhetoric
  26. 10.2307/356373
  27. 10.2307/357680
  28. Rhetoric in the Human Sciences
  29. 10.1080/10417949209372863
  30. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science
  31. 10.1126/science.244.4906.753
  32. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts
  33. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy
  34. 10.1038/340525a0
  35. 10.1080/15295039009360159
  36. 10.1038/338701a0
  37. 10.1086/286513
  38. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology
  39. The Subjective Side of Science: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Psychology of the Apollo…
  40. 10.1088/2058-7058/3/2/29
    Physics World  
  41. Written Communication
  42. Rhetoric in the Human Sciences
  43. Technical Communication Quarterly
  44. 10.1126/science.244.4903.420.a
    Science  
  45. 10.1126/science.244.4905.647
    Science  
  46. A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse
  47. Rhetoric in the Human Sciences
  48. The Philosophy of Rhetoric
  49. Writing in Academic Disciplines
  50. The Rhetorical Turn
  51. The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method: Historical Studies
  52. Rhetoric in the Human Sciences
  53. The Rhetorical Turn
  54. Engineering and Science
  55. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  56. Technical Communication Quarterly
  57. Written Communication
  58. The Uses of Argument
  59. 10.1038/342375a0
  60. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  61. 10.1021/cen-v067n020.p005a