The Rhetoric of Fraud in Breast Cancer Trials: Manifestations in Medical Journals and the Mass Media—And Missed Opportunities

Michael J. Zerbe; Amanda J. Young; Edwin R. Nagelhout

doi:10.2190/9pe1-w6bt-mqwu-jevu

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 1998

The Rhetoric of Fraud in Breast Cancer Trials: Manifestations in Medical Journals and the Mass Media—And Missed Opportunities

Michael J. Zerbe Purdue University West Lafayette ; Amanda J. Young ; Edwin R. Nagelhout Stephen F. Austin State University

Abstract

In 1994, the Chicago Tribune announced in a blaring page-one story that fraud had been discovered in an important nine-year-old medical study which compared two treatments for early-stage breast cancer. The study had assured women that lumpectomy plus radiation was as safe as the more invasive mastectomy procedure for early-stage breast cancer; however, the revelation of fraud called these results into question. We examine the reactions of two professional medical journals to demonstrate how negotiations for upholding ethical norms in science took place within the pages of these publications. Then, we analyze the public discourse surrounding the fraud and show that much of the coverage was devoted to scandal. Both forums missed opportunities: professional journals ignored a chance to explore the blurry boundary between “writing up” and “making up” results that all scientists must negotiate in interpreting and publicizing data, while public discourse neglected women affected by the fraud.

Journal: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published: 1998-01-01
DOI: 10.2190/9pe1-w6bt-mqwu-jevu
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: rhetorical criticism discourse analysis public rhetoric
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

Fahnestock (2025)

The Controversy behind the Controversies: Scientific Discourse in the Twenty-Fi…

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Faber (2002)

Professional Identities: What Is Professional about Professional Communication?

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
STRATMAN (2000)

Readers' Perception of Bias in Public Education Documents: The Case of Ballot B…

Written Communication
Dombrowski (2000)

Ethics and Technical Communication: The Past Quarter Century

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (42) · 5 in this index

Fraud in Breast Cancer Study: Doctor Lied on Data for Decade, Chicago Tribune, pp. 1 and 16, March 13, 1994.
Kosary C. L. (1995)

SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1992
Kuhn T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 35 and …
FAHNESTOCK (1986)

Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts

Written Communication
REEVES (1996)

Language, Rhetoric, and AIDS: The Attitudes and Strategies of Key AIDS Medical …

Written Communication

Show all 42 →

THACKER et al. (1995)

Transmuting Common Substances: The Cold Fusion Controversy and the Rhetoric of …

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Herndl C. G. (1991)

Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Pr…
10.1056/NEJM198503143121101

↗
10.1056/NEJM198903303201302

↗
10.1056/NEJM199405193302010

↗
Huet P.-M. (1994)

New England Journal of Medicine
10.1093/jnci/86.7.527

↗
(1994)

Journal of the National Cancer Institute
(1995)

Journal of the National Cancer Institute
10.1093/jnci/87.7.540

↗
Poisson R. (1994)

New England Journal of Medicine
Halloran (1978)

Technical Writing and the Rhetoric of Science

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
NCI (1994)

10.1093/jnci/86.9.667

Journal of the National Cancer Institute ↗
Broder S. (1994)

New England Journal of Medicine
Bazerman C. (1988)

Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science
Blakeslee A., Acquiring Disciplinary Identity: Connections between Learning and Social Context, 4S Conference…
Gross A. G. (1990)

The Rhetoric of Science
Myers G. (1990)

Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge
10.1007/978-1-349-19636-4

↗
Miller (1989)

Special Review Essay: Some Perspectives on Rhetoric, Science, and History

Rhetorica
Foucault M., The Foucault Reader, Rabinow P. (ed.), Pantheon, New York, p. 109, 1984.
Lincoln Y. S. and Guba E. G., Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage, Newbury Park, California, p. 37, 1985.
Polanyi M., Science, Faith, and Society, Phoenix, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 15 and 54, 1996.
Popper K., In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years, Bennett L. J. (trans.), Routle…
D. M. Stablein and Staff of The Emmes Corporation (1994)

B-06: The Final Report
10.2190/NETC11

↗
Safety of Lumpectomy Confirmed, Chicago Tribune, p. 4, April 20, 1994.
Flawed Cancer Study Haunts Many Women, New York Times, pp. B6–B9, March 16, 1994.
How Safe is Lumpectomy, Newsweek, p. 57, March 28, 1994.
Breast Cancer: A Diagnosis of Deceit, Time, pp. 52–53, March 28, 1994.
Nelkin D. (1997)

Science and Technology Today
Harding S., Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, Ne…
10.1093/jmp/20.3.313

↗
Tilghman S. M. (1997)

Science and Technology Today
Data on Risks Create Debate about Drugs to Prevent Breast Cancer, New York Times, pp. B6–B9, March 16, 1994.
Duffield J. (1997)

Chronicle of Higher Education
10.1177/108056999505800203

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network → Build reading path →

The Rhetoric of Fraud in Breast Cancer Trials: Manifestations in Medical Journals and the Mass Media—And Missed Opportunities

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

References (42) · 5 in this index

Related Articles