The Rhetoric of Fraud in Breast Cancer Trials: Manifestations in Medical Journals and the Mass Media—And Missed Opportunities

Michael J. Zerbe Purdue University West Lafayette ; Amanda J. Young ; Edwin R. Nagelhout Stephen F. Austin State University

Abstract

In 1994, the Chicago Tribune announced in a blaring page-one story that fraud had been discovered in an important nine-year-old medical study which compared two treatments for early-stage breast cancer. The study had assured women that lumpectomy plus radiation was as safe as the more invasive mastectomy procedure for early-stage breast cancer; however, the revelation of fraud called these results into question. We examine the reactions of two professional medical journals to demonstrate how negotiations for upholding ethical norms in science took place within the pages of these publications. Then, we analyze the public discourse surrounding the fraud and show that much of the coverage was devoted to scandal. Both forums missed opportunities: professional journals ignored a chance to explore the blurry boundary between “writing up” and “making up” results that all scientists must negotiate in interpreting and publicizing data, while public discourse neglected women affected by the fraud.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1998-01-01
DOI
10.2190/9pe1-w6bt-mqwu-jevu
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1056/NEJM198503143121101
  2. 10.1056/NEJM198903303201302
  3. 10.1056/NEJM199405193302010
  4. 10.1093/jnci/86.7.527
  5. 10.1093/jnci/87.7.540
  6. 10.1093/jnci/86.9.667
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute  
  7. 10.1007/978-1-349-19636-4
  8. 10.1525/rh.1989.7.1.101
  9. 10.2190/NETC11
  10. 10.1093/jmp/20.3.313
  11. 10.1177/108056999505800203
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →