Abstract

This article studies the fate of scientific observations as they pass from original research reports intended for scientific peers into popular accounts aimed at a general audience. Pairing articles from two AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science) publications reveals the changes that inevitably occur in “information” as it passes from one rhetorical situation to another. Scientific reports belong to the genre of forensic arguments, affirming the validity of past facts, the experimental data. But a change of audience brings a change of genre; science accommodations are primarily epideictic, celebrations of science, and shifts in wording between comparable statements in matched articles reveal changes made to conform to the two appeals of popularized science, the wonder and the application topoi. Science accommodations emphasize the uniqueness, rarity, originality of observations, removing hedges and qualifications and thus conferring greater certainty on the reported facts. Such changes could be formalized by adopting the scale developed by sociologists Bruno Latour and Steven Woolgar for categorizing the status of claims. The alteration of information is traced not only in articles on bees and bears, and so on, but also on a subject where distortions in reporting research can have serious consequences—the reputed mathematical inferiority of girls to boys. The changes in genre and the status of information that occur between scientific articles and their popularizations can also be explained by classical stasis theory. Anything addressed to readers as members of the general public will inevitably move through the four stasis questions from fact and cause to value and action.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1986-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088386003003001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (76)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Show all 76 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Rhetoric Review
  6. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  7. College English
  8. Technical Communication Quarterly
  9. Written Communication
  10. Written Communication
  11. Written Communication
  12. Assessing Writing
  13. Written Communication
  14. Technical Communication Quarterly
  15. Technical Communication Quarterly
  16. Technical Communication Quarterly
  17. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  18. Rhetoric Review
  19. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  20. Written Communication
  21. Written Communication
  22. Technical Communication Quarterly
  23. Communication Design Quarterly
  24. Written Communication
  25. Written Communication
  26. Technical Communication Quarterly
  27. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  28. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  29. Pedagogy
  30. Rhetoric Review
  31. Written Communication
  32. Written Communication
  33. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  34. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  35. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  36. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  37. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  38. Rhetoric Review
  39. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  40. Written Communication
  41. Written Communication
  42. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  43. Written Communication
  44. Written Communication
  45. Written Communication
  46. Written Communication
  47. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  48. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  49. Technical Communication Quarterly
  50. Written Communication
  51. Written Communication
  52. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  53. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  54. Written Communication
  55. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  56. Written Communication
  57. Written Communication
  58. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  59. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  60. Rhetoric Review
  61. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  62. Written Communication
  63. Rhetoric Review
  64. Written Communication
  65. Written Communication
  66. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  67. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  68. Written Communication
  69. Written Communication
  70. Written Communication
  71. Written Communication

References (30) · 1 in this index

  1. New York Times
  2. The complete works
  3. Science
  4. The universe and Dr. Einstein
  5. 10.1177/030631284014002001
Show all 30 →
  1. 10.1126/science.7434028
  2. 10.1126/science.212.4491.118.b
    Science  
  3. Science
  4. Cicero on oratory and orators
  5. Science
  6. Newsweek
  7. Argument in transition: Proceedings of the third summer conference on argumentation
  8. Oldspeak/Newspeak
  9. Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse
  10. 10.1126/science.6089349
  11. 10.2307/357858
  12. Science
  13. The eighth day of creation: Makers of the revolution in biology
  14. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts
  15. 10.1126/science.6337398
  16. Written Communication
  17. 10.1080/03637756409375419
  18. 10.1126/science.6494914
  19. 10.1126/science.221.4609.459
  20. 10.1126/science.217.4564.1059
  21. Strategies for business and technical writing
  22. 10.1126/science.6701529
  23. Time
  24. Ulrich's international periodical directory
  25. Science