The public policy debate over newborn HIV testing: A case study of the knowledge enthymeme

Rhetoric Society Quarterly Mar 2002

The public policy debate over newborn HIV testing: A case study of the knowledge enthymeme

J. Blake Scott University of Florida

Abstract

Abstract This essay analyzes the web of persuasion named the “knowledge enthymeme”; in the public policy debate over mandatory newborn HIV testing in the United States and especially New York. Bringing together classical rhetorical theory and Foucault's theory of the knowledge‐power loop, the essay explains how the conceptual/argumentative frame of the knowledge enthymeme helped shape the knowledge‐power relations of mandatory newborn testing in dangerous ways. Ultimately, the knowledge enthymeme blocked more responsive approaches to testing by exaggerating the beneficial effects of testing and its knowledge, ignoring the contingenices of this knowledge, and bypassing the “situated knowledges “ of the women it targets.

Journal: Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published: 2002-03-01
DOI: 10.1080/02773940209391228
Open Access: Closed
Topics: qualitative research

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

Whitney (2025)

Please Provide the Following Information: Enthymemes and the Logics of Individu…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Longaker (2005)

Market Rhetoric and the Ebonics Debate

Written Communication

Cites in this index (3)

Walker (1994)

The Body of Persuasion: A Theory of the Enthymeme

College English
Poster (1992)

A historicist recontextualization of the enthymeme

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
FAHNESTOCK (1986)

Accommodating Science

Written Communication

Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓

Bateman David A. (1995)

10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170180111020

Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine ↗
10.1017/CBO9780511571046.009

↗
10.1080/09540129308258598

↗
Berger Jeffrey T. (1996)

10.1086/JCE199607111

Journal of Clinical Ethics ↗
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980130)17:2<169::AID-SIM759>3.0.CO;2-8

↗
10.1080/00335638409383687

↗
10.1007/BF02260334

↗
10.1007/BF02260335

↗
10.1377/hlthaff.17.4.170

↗
10.1023/A:1025027230068

↗
10.2307/3471573

↗
10.1056/NEJM199501263320421

↗
10.1001/jama.261.9.1326

↗
10.2307/3350109

↗
10.1097/00003081-198909000-00013

↗
10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199812)21:6<499::AID-NUR4>3.0.CO;2-6

↗
Minkoff Howard (1997)

10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb18325.x

Acta Paediatr Supplement ↗
Minkoff Howard L. (1998)

10.1016/S0002-9378(88)80136-4

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology ↗
10.1001/jama.282.6.577

↗
10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.tb00581.x

↗
10.1056/NEJM199411033311801

↗
Scott J. Blake (2001)

10.1080/10417940109373191

Southern Communication Journal ↗
10.1093/clinids/19.4.664

↗
10.1001/jama.264.18.2416

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →