Abstract

In this article, the author proposes a methodology for the rhetorical analysis of scientific, technical, mathematical, and engineering (STEM) discourse based on the common topics (topoi) of this discourse. Beginning with work by Miller, Prelli, and other rhetoricians of STEM discourse—but factoring in related studies in cognitive linguistics—she argues for a reimagining of topoi as basic schema that interrelate texts, objects, and writers in STEM communities. Then, she proposes a topical method as a stable, broadly applicable heuristic that may help fit the rhetorical dynamics of the much-studied research article (RA) into the wider context of written technical discourse—exactly the type of improvement that Gross, Fahnestock, and others have proposed. Finally, as an illustration of this argument, the author performs a pilot topical survey of 18 RAs representing six STEM disciplines. This survey yields a set of 30 topoi used samplewide that can form a starting point for future surveys. She answers challenges to the significance and relevance of a topical method and finishes by sketching some future applications of the method that can move rhetoric of science beyond the RA.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088309353501
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (13)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Review
  5. Written Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. Written Communication
  7. Written Communication
  8. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (56) · 12 in this index

  1. Topica. (E. S. Forster, trans.) Loeb Classical Library
  2. Logics of conversation
  3. Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context
  4. Shaping written knowledge
  5. Bazerman, C. ( 1997). Reporting the experiment: The changing account of scientific doings in the philosophica…
Show all 56 →
  1. Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin, T. ( 1995). News value. In Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication (pp. 27-4…
  2. Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T.N. & Ackerman, J. ( 1990). Social context and socially constructed texts: The ini…
  3. Interacting with audiences: Social influences on the production of scientific writing
  4. Burke, K. (1984). Attitudes toward history. Berkeley: University of California Press. Fleck, L. (1981). Genes…
  5. Truth and method (2nd rev
  6. Opening pandora’s box: A sociological analysis of scientific discourse
  7. The rhetoric of Blair, Campbell, and Whitely
  8. Written Communication
  9. Rhetorical figures in science
  10. Technical Communication Quarterly
  11. Fahnestock, J. & Secor, M. ( 1991). The rhetoric of literary criticism. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), D…
  12. Written Communication
  13. Galison, P. (2008). Ten problems in history and philosophy of science. Isis, 99, 111-124. Gaonkar, D. P. (199…
  14. The rhetoric of science
  15. Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present
  16. The Structure of Task-Oriented Dialogs. IEEE Symposium on Speech Recognition, Contributed…
  17. Cohesion in English
  18. Writing science. Literacy and discursive power
  19. Technical Communication Quarterly
  20. On the coherence and structure of discourse (No. CSLI-85-37)
  21. 10.1016/S0271-5309(96)00023-7
  22. Technical Communication Quarterly
  23. From discourse to logic: Introduction to model-theoretic semantics of natural language, f…
  24. Communication at a distance
  25. Science and Values
  26. Rhetorica
  27. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  28. 10.2307/412701
  29. 10.1515/9783112329924
  30. Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences
  31. 10.1080/01638538609544632
  32. Merton, R.K. ( 1973). The normative structure of science. In N. W. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science (pp…
  33. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  34. Miller, C.R. & Selzer, J. ( 1985). Special topics of argument in engineering reports. In L. Odell & D. Goswam…
  35. Written Communication
  36. Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge
  37. Evidence for Iconicity: The instance relation in informational exposition. M.A. Thesis
  38. Conference on College Composition and Communication
  39. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver
  40. A rhetoric of science: Inventing scientific discourse
  41. Prelli, L.J. ( 1997). The rhetorical construction of scientific ethos. In R. A. Harris (Ed.), Landmark studie…
  42. Rymer, J. ( 1988). Scientific composing processes: How eminent scientists write journal articles. In D. Jolli…
  43. 10.1177/030631284014004001
  44. Swales, J. ( 1990). Research articles in English. In Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Setting…
  45. 10.1080/10350330802469961
  46. 10.1080/00335637209383137
  47. Gadamer: Hermeneutics, tradition, and reason
  48. Written Communication
  49. Written Communication
  50. College English
  51. 10.1080/09500690500336601