Abstract

In this article, the author proposes a methodology for the rhetorical analysis of scientific, technical, mathematical, and engineering (STEM) discourse based on the common topics (topoi) of this discourse. Beginning with work by Miller, Prelli, and other rhetoricians of STEM discourse—but factoring in related studies in cognitive linguistics—she argues for a reimagining of topoi as basic schema that interrelate texts, objects, and writers in STEM communities. Then, she proposes a topical method as a stable, broadly applicable heuristic that may help fit the rhetorical dynamics of the much-studied research article (RA) into the wider context of written technical discourse—exactly the type of improvement that Gross, Fahnestock, and others have proposed. Finally, as an illustration of this argument, the author performs a pilot topical survey of 18 RAs representing six STEM disciplines. This survey yields a set of 30 topoi used samplewide that can form a starting point for future surveys. She answers challenges to the significance and relevance of a topical method and finishes by sketching some future applications of the method that can move rhetoric of science beyond the RA.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088309353501
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (11)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Written Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 11 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. College English
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. Rhetorical figures in science
  2. Galison, P. (2008). Ten problems in history and philosophy of science. Isis, 99, 111-124. Gaonkar, D. P. (199…
  3. Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present
  4. 10.1016/S0271-5309(96)00023-7
  5. 10.1525/rh.1983.1.1.23
  6. 10.2307/412701
  7. 10.1515/9783112329924
  8. 10.1080/01638538609544632
  9. 10.1177/030631284014004001
  10. 10.1080/10350330802469961
  11. 10.1080/00335637209383137
  12. 10.1080/09500690500336601
CrossRef global citation count: 26 View in citation network →