Abstract

Scholars in the field of writing and rhetorical studies have long been interested in professional writing and the ways in which experts frame their research for disciplinary audiences. Three decades ago, rhetoricians incorporated stasis theory into their work as a way to explore the nature of argument and persuasion in scientific discourse. However, what is missing in these general arguments based on stasis are the particular arguments in science texts aimed at persuasion. Specifically, this article analyzes arguments from the stasis of value in introductions of science research articles. This work is grounded in the Classical topoi, or topics, cataloging types of arguments and identifying seven topoi. I analyzed 60 introductions from articles in three different science journals, totaling the number of value arguments and arguments comprising the topoi. Findings yielded different proportions in types of arguments, sharp disparities among the journals, and widespread use of value arguments. The broader issue at work in this article is how scientists make a case for the importance of their research and how these findings might inform writing and argumentation in the sciences.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2021-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088320983364
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (12)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Show all 12 →
  1. Poroi
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Rhetoric Review
  6. Written Communication
  7. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 35 works outside this index ↓
  1. Afros E., Schryer C. F. (2009). Promotional (meta)discourse in research articles in language and literacy stu…
  2. Anthony L. (1999). Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard…
  3. Basturkmen H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and master’s dissertations and lan…
  4. Basturkmen H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry an…
  5. 10.4135/9781849208604
  6. Buzas M. A., Culver S. J. (1986). Geographic origin of benthic foraminiferal species. Science, 232(4751), 775…
  7. Dieter O. A. L. (1950). Stasis. Speech Monographs, 17(4), 345-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637755009375016
  8. 10.5840/jcr19881128
    Journal of Communication and Religion  
  9. Franzoni C., Scellato G., Stephan P. (2011). Changing incentives to publish. Science, 333(6043), 702-703. htt…
  10. 10.1057/9781137030825_2
  11. Harwood N. (2005a). “Nowhere has anyone attempted . In this article I aim to do just that”: A corpus-based st…
  12. Harwood N. (2005b). “We do not seem to have a theory . The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap”: …
  13. Hyland K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239-25…
  14. Hyland K., Tse P. (2005). Evaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions o…
  15. Jack J., Appelbaum L. G., Beam E., Moody J., Huettel S. A. (2017). Mapping rhetorical topologies in cognitive…
  16. Lee H., Lee K. (2013). Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean…
  17. Luther G. W., Church T. M., Scudlark J. R., Cosman M. (1986). Inorganic and organic sulfur cycling in salt-ma…
  18. Martin T. (1995). Apostasy to paganism: The rhetorical stasis of the Galatian controversy. Journal of Biblica…
  19. Mur-Dueñas P. (2012). A corpus-based analysis of two crucial steps in business management research articles: …
  20. Nadeau R. (1964) Hermogenes’ On Stases: A translation with an introduction and notes. Speech Monographs, 31(4…
  21. Neff M. W. (2018). Publication incentives undermine the utility of science: Ecological research in Mexico. Sc…
  22. Paglieri F., Woods J. (2011a). Enthymematic parsimony. Synthese, 178, 461-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229…
  23. Paglieri F., Woods J. (2011b). From reconstruction to understanding. Argumentation, 25(2), 127-139. https://d…
  24. Reich E. S. (2013). Science publishing: The golden club. Nature, 502(7471). www.nature.com/news/science-publi…
  25. 10.1075/dapsac.9
  26. Samraj B (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purp…
  27. Shaw P. (2003). Evaluation and promotion across languages. Journal of English in Academic Purposes, 2(4), 343…
  28. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
  29. 10.3998/mpub.2173936
  30. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001
  31. 10.1017/CBO9780511840005
  32. van Dalen H. P., Henkens K. (2012). Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A wo…
  33. Walsh L. (2012). Accountability: Towards a definition of hybridity of scholars for transnational rhetorics. R…
  34. Walsh L., Boyle C. (Eds.). (2017). Topologies as techniques for a post-critical rhetoric. Palgrave Macmillan.…
  35. Walsh L., Ross A. B. (2015). The visual invention practices of STEM researchers: An exploratory topology. Sci…
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →