Abstract

Scholars in the field of writing and rhetorical studies have long been interested in professional writing and the ways in which experts frame their research for disciplinary audiences. Three decades ago, rhetoricians incorporated stasis theory into their work as a way to explore the nature of argument and persuasion in scientific discourse. However, what is missing in these general arguments based on stasis are the particular arguments in science texts aimed at persuasion. Specifically, this article analyzes arguments from the stasis of value in introductions of science research articles. This work is grounded in the Classical topoi, or topics, cataloging types of arguments and identifying seven topoi. I analyzed 60 introductions from articles in three different science journals, totaling the number of value arguments and arguments comprising the topoi. Findings yielded different proportions in types of arguments, sharp disparities among the journals, and widespread use of value arguments. The broader issue at work in this article is how scientists make a case for the importance of their research and how these findings might inform writing and argumentation in the sciences.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2021-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088320983364
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Rhetoric Review

References (71) · 15 in this index

  1. Afros E., Schryer C. F. (2009). Promotional (meta)discourse in research articles in language and literacy stu…
  2. American Chemical Society. (n.d.a). About ACS. https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/about.html?sc=180808_Global…
  3. American Chemical Society. (n.d.b). Fast facts about ACS. https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/about/aboutacs.html
  4. American Chemical Society. (n.d.c). ACS History. https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/about/history.html
  5. American Chemical Society. (2018). Author guidelines. http://pubs.acs.org/paragonplus/submission/jacsat/jacsa…
Show all 71 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. On rhetoric: A theory of civil discourse
  3. Backes-Gellner U., Schlinghoff A. (2008). Monetary rewards and faculty behaviour: How economic incentives dri…
  4. Basturkmen H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and master’s dissertations and lan…
  5. Basturkmen H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry an…
  6. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power
  7. 10.4135/9781849208604
  8. British Ecological Society. (n.d.a). Aims and scope. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/…
  9. British Ecological Society. (n.d.b). Who we are. https://www.britishecologicalsociety.org/about/our-work/
  10. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  11. Buzas M. A., Culver S. J. (1986). Geographic origin of benthic foraminiferal species. Science, 232(4751), 775…
  12. Written Communication
  13. Written Communication
  14. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  15. Dieter O. A. L. (1950). Stasis. Speech Monographs, 17(4), 345-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637755009375016
  16. 10.5840/jcr19881128
    Journal of Communication and Religion  
  17. Written Communication
  18. Franzoni C., Scellato G., Stephan P. (2011). Changing incentives to publish. Science, 333(6043), 702-703. htt…
  19. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  20. 10.1057/9781137030825_2
  21. Rhetoric Review
  22. Harwood N. (2005a). “Nowhere has anyone attempted . In this article I aim to do just that”: A corpus-based st…
  23. Harwood N. (2005b). “We do not seem to have a theory . The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap”: …
  24. Hunston S. (1989). Evaluation in experimental research articles [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universi…
  25. Register analysis: Theory and practice
  26. Advances in written text analysis
  27. Hyland K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239-25…
  28. Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing
  29. Hyland K., Tse P. (2005). Evaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions o…
  30. International Brain Research Organization. (n.d.). History of IBRO. https://ibro.org/history/
  31. Jack J., Appelbaum L. G., Beam E., Moody J., Huettel S. A. (2017). Mapping rhetorical topologies in cognitive…
  32. The art of persuasion in Greece
  33. Greek rhetoric under Christian emperors
  34. Lee H., Lee K. (2013). Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean…
  35. Promotion and politeness: Conflicting scholarly rhetoric in three disciplines
  36. Luther G. W., Church T. M., Scudlark J. R., Cosman M. (1986). Inorganic and organic sulfur cycling in salt-ma…
  37. Martin T. (1995). Apostasy to paganism: The rhetorical stasis of the Galatian controversy. Journal of Biblica…
  38. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  39. Rereading Aristotle’s rhetoric
  40. Mur-Dueñas P. (2012). A corpus-based analysis of two crucial steps in business management research articles: …
  41. Nadeau R. (1959). Classical systems of stases in Greek: Hermagoras to Hermogenes. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine…
  42. Nadeau R. (1964) Hermogenes’ On Stases : A translation with an in…
  43. Neff M. W. (2018). Publication incentives undermine the utility of science: Ecological research in Mexico. Sc…
  44. Neuroscience. (n.d.). Guide for authors. https://www.elsevier.com/journals/neuroscience/0306-4522/guide-for-authors
  45. Paglieri F., Woods J. (2011a). Enthymematic parsimony. Synthese, 178, 461-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229…
  46. Argumentation
  47. Reich E. S. (2013). Science publishing: The golden club. Nature, 502(7471). www.nature.com/news/science-publi…
  48. 10.1075/dapsac.9
  49. Written Communication
  50. Royal Society of Chemistry. (n.d.). Prepare your article: Guidelines for authors on how to write and structur…
  51. Samraj B (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purp…
  52. Shaw P. (2003). Evaluation and promotion across languages. Journal of English in Academic Purposes, 2(4), 343…
  53. Shehzad W. (2010). Announcement of the principal findings and value addition in computer science research pap…
  54. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings
  55. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
  56. 10.3998/mpub.2173936
  57. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001
  58. 10.1017/CBO9780511840005
  59. An introduction to reasoning
  60. van Dalen H. P., Henkens K. (2012). Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A wo…
  61. Poroi
  62. Written Communication
  63. Rhetorica
  64. Walsh L., Boyle C. (Eds.). (2017). Topologies as techniques for a post-critical rhetoric. Palgrave Macmillan.…
  65. Walsh L., Ross A. B. (2015). The visual invention practices of STEM researchers: An exploratory topology. Sci…
  66. Technical Communication Quarterly