Abstract

This paper attempts to revive an ancient idea, Hermagoras's notion of the staseis, emphasizing especially his fourth stasis, that of jurisdiction, which, I contend, is crucial when it comes to answering a class of interesting questions that can be properly addressed only by first addressing the question of intellectual jurisdiction. This class concerns what Thomas Kuhn calls "paradigm change"; in all of these cases, I would contend, four disciplines-philosophy of science, history of science, psychology, and rhetoric-are necessary to any complete explanation.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2004-04-01
DOI
10.1207/s15327981rr2302_3
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1007/BF01801420
    Journal for General Philosophy of Science  
  2. 10.1016/0039-3681(92)90026-3
  3. 10.1093/bjps/31.2.181
    British Journal of Philosophy of Science  
  4. Longino, Helen. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2002.
  5. 10.1007/978-94-009-3025-4_23
    Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change. Ed. Kostas Gavroglu, Yorgos Goudaroulis, Pantelis Nicolacopoulos Dordrecht: Kluwer  
  6. 10.1007/978-94-011-3716-4_5
    Epistemology and Cognition. Ed. J. H. Fetzer. Dordrecht: Kluwer  
CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →