Communicating complexity in transdisciplinary science teams for policy: applied stasis theory for organizing and assembling collaboration

Marybeth Shea University of Maryland, College Park ; Cameron Mozafari University of Maryland, College Park

Abstract

This paper presents an application of stasis theory for the purpose of consulting with interdisciplinary teams of scientists working in the early stages of composing a science policy advisory document. By showing that stasis theory can be used as an organizing conceptual tool, we demonstrate how cooperative and organized question-asking practices calm complex interdisciplinary scientific disputations in order to propel productive science policy work. We believe that the conceptual structure of stasis theory motivates scientists to shift their viewpoints from solitary expert specialists toward that of allied policy guides for their advisory document's reader. We further argue that, through the use of stasis theory, technical writers can aid interdisciplinary scientists in policy writing processes, thus fostering transdisciplinary collaboration.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2014-05-01
DOI
10.1145/2644448.2644453
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (11) · 2 in this index

  1. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008
  2. Toward a modern version of stasis theory
  3. Written Communication
  4. Rhetoric Review
  5. Starring the text: The place of rhetoric in science studies
Show all 11 →
  1. Rhetoric and Incommensurability
  2. Networked reenactments: Stories transdisciplinary knowledges tell
  3. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind
  4. Miscellaneous extracts from Leibniz's philosophical writings
  5. Ross D. (2013 September 3). Sharing expertise and bridging cultures: Communicating with scientists about comm…
  6. Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science