Abstract

This article presents a qualitative text analysis of persuasive documents written by a major U.S. airline in a 2004 counter-campaign against the Teamsters union. The methodology for this study is based on Stephen Toulmin's argument model, including his “double triad” and his interpretation of artistic proofs, which parallel the three classical rhetorical appeals. Actual corporate documents are featured in this article, supported by content from management conference calls that were attended by the researchers. The article concludes with implications for teaching and research in the field of technical and professional communication.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2007-04-01
DOI
10.2190/b1jj-43xm-k615-6833
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4271/R-192
  2. 10.1177/002194360203900203
  3. 10.1109/TPC.2004.837981
  4. 10.1108/09564239210019450
  5. 10.1109/TPC.2004.837969
  6. Brockriede W. and Ehninger D., Toulmin on Argument: An Interpretation and Application, from the Quarterly of …
  7. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00776.x
  8. 10.1109/TPC.2004.840486
  9. 10.1109/TPC.2006.875088
  10. 10.1177/0021943604271701
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →