Stasis in Space! Viewing Definitional Conflicts Surrounding the James Webb Space Telescope Funding Debate

Ryan Weber University of Alabama in Huntsville

Abstract

During 2010 and 2011, debate ensued over funding for National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). This article uses stasis theory to analyze reports and statements produced by NASA, politicians, and scientists. The analysis reveals that an official report addresses stasis questions and guides further action. Additionally, varying perspectives on the telescope suggest that definitions play a crucial role in technology funding debates. This analysis demonstrates that stasis theory provides a productive tool for analyzing technology policy debates.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2016-04-02
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2016.1149619
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Written Communication

References (42) · 19 in this index

  1. 10.1177/108056998805100404
  2. 10.1038/4671028a
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 42 →
  1. Appropriations Bill, 112th Congress
  2. 10.1080/03637755009375016
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. Written Communication
  9. Written Communication
  10. Oldspeak/newspeak rhetorical traditions
  11. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  12. 10.1080/00909880600911249
  13. Judgment, rhetoric, and the problem of incommensurability: Recalling practical wisdom
  14. Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in pr…
  15. Howard, R. (2011a). James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) program status. Presentation given at NASA Advisory Cou…
  16. Presentation given to NASA Astrophysics Subcommittee
  17. Viewing the earth: The social construction of the Landsat satellite system
  18. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.11.002
  19. November
  20. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  21. New York Times. (2011). Keep the Webb Telescope, 32 Nobel Laureates Say. [Letter to the Editor]. New York Tim…
  22. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  23. Editorial: JWST Threatens Planetary Science. (September 8, 2011). Planetary Exploration Newsletter. 5 (40).
  24. A rhetoric of science
  25. Communication Studies
  26. Technical Communication Quarterly
  27. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  28. 10.1016/S0959-8022(96)90016-8
  29. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  30. Swiss Society for Astrophysics and Astronomy. (October 21, 2011). Retrieved from http://www.aura-astronomy.or…
  31. Defining science: The rhetoric of demarcation
  32. The Next Great Observatory: Assessing the James Webb Space Telescope. Hearing before the Committee on Science…
  33. Assessing the James Webb Space Telescope. Hearing before the Committee on Science, Space,…
  34. Assessing the James Webb Space Telescope. Hearing before the Committee on Science, Space,…
  35. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  36. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  37. Journal of Business and Technical Communication