Stasis in Space! Viewing Definitional Conflicts Surrounding the James Webb Space Telescope Funding Debate

Ryan Weber University of Alabama in Huntsville

Abstract

During 2010 and 2011, debate ensued over funding for National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). This article uses stasis theory to analyze reports and statements produced by NASA, politicians, and scientists. The analysis reveals that an official report addresses stasis questions and guides further action. Additionally, varying perspectives on the telescope suggest that definitions play a crucial role in technology funding debates. This analysis demonstrates that stasis theory provides a productive tool for analyzing technology policy debates.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2016-04-02
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2016.1149619
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Written Communication

Cites in this index (16)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 16 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  8. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  9. Written Communication
  10. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  11. Written Communication
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/108056998805100404
  2. 10.1038/4671028a
  3. 10.1109/TPC.1987.6449074
  4. 10.1080/03637755009375016
  5. 10.1109/47.108666
  6. 10.1080/00909880600911249
  7. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.11.002
  8. 10.1016/S0959-8022(96)90016-8
  9. 10.1109/47.7814
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →