Abstract

In my technical writing class, I examine two “meanings” from the Challenger disaster to illustrate the social contingency of meaning even in science and technology. These instances are the “anomalous” charring of the O‐rings and the reconceptualized assumption of flightworthiness the night before the launch. The social contingency of these meanings shows that the “object” of technical communication is not the material object as a pre‐existent isolate but in its social interpretation, significance, and meaning. Ultimately, technical communication is about people communicating about and to the interests of other people.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
1992-06-01
DOI
10.1080/10572259209359507
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (16)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 16 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Technical Communication Quarterly
  9. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  10. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  11. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. Language as Symbolic Action.
  2. 10.1109/47.108666
  3. 10.1080/10510977809367982
    Central States Speech Journal  
  4. 10.1109/TPC.1990.10718329
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.  
  5. 10.2307/375964
  6. 10.1109/47.7814
CrossRef global citation count: 23 View in citation network →