Failure Matters: Conflicting Practices in a High-Tech Case

Ehren Helmut Pflugfelder Oregon State University

Abstract

Technical communication researchers have studied failure through a number of different case studies, though none more often than the space shuttle Challenger explosion. While scholars have offered several explanations in the intervening three decades, this work often treats the disaster as a failure of organizational communication, a failure of the material O-ring, or a failure of two discourse communities, engineers and managers, to engage in mutually comprehensible forms of meaningful deliberation. This essay hypothesizes that the real cause of failure was neither positivist nor social constructionist in nature, but discursive-material. I offer discussion of the Challenger case in order to frame a different study of project failure and show that complex technical projects fail for a number discursive-material reasons. Employing assumptions from actor–network theory and Barad’s theory of agential realism, this essay establishes a basis for how to read the Challenger disaster as one of competing and unresolved “conceptual structures of practice.” I then take this framework and apply it to a case study of a transportation project at a large, Midwestern research university. This project, the electric personal transportation vehicle, failed because competing structures of practice generated powerful actants that mattered in different ways. Insufficient project management activities also contributed to failure; the conclusion identifies concepts technical communicators can employ in establishing more effective project management strategies that work to resolve competing actants.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2018-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281616662984
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (22)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 22 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. College Composition and Communication
  8. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  9. Technical Communication Quarterly
  10. Technical Communication Quarterly
  11. Technical Communication Quarterly
  12. Technical Communication Quarterly
  13. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  14. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  15. Technical Communication Quarterly
  16. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  17. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
  2. 10.1007/978-1-349-07408-2_2
  3. 10.1109/47.108666
  4. 10.1109/47.406727
  5. 10.1109/TPC.2007.908729
  6. 10.1353/tech.2000.0060
  7. 10.1080/10510978609368212
  8. 10.7208/chicago/9780226264196.001.0001
  9. 10.1023/A:1017986712405
  10. 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
  11. 10.1007/BF01059830
  12. 10.1177/030631279402400402
  13. Pflugfelder, E. H. (2011). Sustaining knowledge work in student engineering clubs. In Proceedings of the inte…
  14. 10.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001
  15. Potts, L. (2008). Diagramming with actor network theory: A method for modeling holistic experience. In Procee…
  16. 10.4324/9780203366905
  17. 10.1080/10510978809363235
  18. 10.7551/mitpress/6875.001.0001
  19. 10.2190/CPIC3
  20. 10.1017/CBO9780511509605
  21. 10.1177/002194360304000303
  22. 10.2307/378336
  23. 10.1109/47.7814
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →