Framing Arguments in a Technical Controversy: Assumptions about Science and Technology in the Decision to Launch the Space Shuttle Challenger

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 1993

Framing Arguments in a Technical Controversy: Assumptions about Science and Technology in the Decision to Launch the Space Shuttle Challenger

Christine M. Miller California State University, Sacramento

Abstract

This article explores the assumptions about science and technology held by the engineers who attempted to delay the launch of the Challenger space shuttle. These assumptions, it is argued, affected the ways in which the engineers framed the arguments used to persuade managers not to launch. Examining the decision making processes prior to the tragedy reveals three dominant conceptions of science and technology which guided the engineers' persuasive efforts, and which appear to account for why the engineers did not succeed in their attempt to influence the managers.

Journal: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published: 1993-04-01
DOI: 10.2190/1wjk-jhv5-k071-03jt
Open Access: Closed
Topics: affect and writing

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

Pflugfelder (2018)

Failure Matters: Conflicting Practices in a High-Tech Case

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Kienzler (2001)

Ethics, Critical Thinking, and Professional Communication Pedagogy

Technical Communication Quarterly
Henry (1994)

Toward Technical Authorship

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓

10.1080/00335639009383910

↗
Gouran D. S., Hirokawa R. Y., and Martz A. E., A Critical Analysis of Factors Related to Decisional Problems …

↗
10.1080/00335638609383764

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →