The lessons of the Challenger investigations

Abstract

It is pointed out that, both in methodology and in findings, the investigations of the Challenger disaster by a Presidential Commission and by a Congressional committee demonstrate that even in highly technical matters meaning is socially constructed. The author examines the evidence and testimony before the investigating bodies and finds that, before the launch, NASA officials construed information about O-ring charring in socially contingent ways and ultimately pressed engineers to work under similar assumptions in declaring the shuttle flightworthy. Although the two investigations examined much the same evidence, differing methodological assumptions led them to different conclusions and recommendations. It is found that both investigations emphasized procedural concerns while largely neglecting personal judgment and responsibility, even though the evidence suggests a key role for personal and social judgment. It is concluded that the field of professional communication needs to become more alert to the role of social factors in technical matters.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
1991-01-01
DOI
10.1109/47.108666
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (31)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 31 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  6. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  7. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  8. Technical Communication Quarterly
  9. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  10. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  11. Written Communication
  12. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  13. Argumentation
  14. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  15. Technical Communication Quarterly
  16. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  17. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  18. Technical Communication Quarterly
  19. Technical Communication Quarterly
  20. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  21. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  22. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  23. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  24. Technical Communication Quarterly
  25. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  26. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (22) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.2307/375964
  2. 10.1177/016224398901400104
  3. 10.1080/10510977809367982
  4. Shaping Written Knowledge The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science
  5. The Social Construction of Reality A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge
Show all 22 →
  1. Science in Action How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society
  2. Invention as a Social Act
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. 10.1525/9780520340664
    Language as Symbolic Action  
  5. The Legacy of Kenneth Burke
  6. 10.1080/10510978609368212
  7. 10.1080/10510978809363235
  8. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  9. Textual Dynamics of the Professions Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities
  10. 10.1080/10510978609368214
  11. 10.1080/10510978609368213
  12. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  13. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  14. Against Method
  15. Committee on Science and Technology House of Representatives Ninety-ninth Congress
  16. People or procedures? The ethical lessons of the Challenger disaster
    1989 Conference of The Society for the Social Studies of Science
  17. Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident