Abstract

This article analyzes Herbert C. Hoover's translation of the De Re Metallica (1956) in the context of the 1922 Mine Strikes. The De Re Metallica combines practical instruction in mining techniques with a philosophical justification of the practice of mining. In Book I of the De Re Metallica, Agricola consciously constructs a rationalized science of metallurgy and mineralogy to enable expert miners to profit in a risky enterprise. Analysis of the text thus reveals that Hoover's interest in Agricola's “intellectual achievements” may have been more than technical. The economical and political assumptions that drive Agricola's arguments—justification of mining as a profit-making enterprise, his notions that accidents occur because workers are careless, and his rhetorical use of the notion of scientific expertise—framed many of the early twentieth century debates between mine operators and union organizers. In revisioning Agricola's arguments in the context of Hoover's own Principles of Mining and his statements in the 1922 Mine Crisis, this article demonstrates how technical documents reflect the political ideologies of their writers and how political arguments presented as purely technical debates shape the uses and construction of future technologies.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1993-07-01
DOI
10.2190/a74f-jd7q-m01j-b6nr
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Written Communication

References (35) · 5 in this index

  1. Hoover H. in Agricola G., De Re Metallica (1556), Hoover H. and Hoover L. H. (trans.), New York, Dover, p. ii…
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. 10.1177/016224398901400104
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 35 →
  1. Textual Dynamics of the Professions
  2. 10.7591/9781501735738
  3. Feminist Perspectives: Philosophical Essays on Method and Morals
  4. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives
  5. “Doing it the Hard Way”: Investigations of Gender and Technology
  6. Body/Politics: Women and the Discourses of Science
  7. Reflections on Gender and Science
  8. The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community
  9. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution
  10. The Poetics of Gender
  11. Rhetoric in Transition
  12. 10.2190/NETC11
  13. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science
  14. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society
  15. De Re Metallica
  16. The Profession of Engineering: Essays
  17. The Memoirs of Herbert Hoover: Years of Adventure (1874–1920)
  18. Principles of Mining: Valuation, Organization, and Administration
  19. Hoover H., Address to the American Federation of Labor, October 6, 1930, public papers of the Presidents of t…
  20. Coal Strike and Congress, New York Times, p. 14, June 9, 1922.
  21. Hoover Cites Need of Government Action, in Address at Dinner of Salesmen's Assn of American Chemical Industry…
  22. Harding Checked by Lewis's Stand May Force Parlay, New York Times, p. 1, June 17, 1922.
  23. Says Coal Tie Up is Harm to Public, New York Times, p. 34, September 6, 1922.
  24. Monthly Labor Review
  25. The Coming of Coal
  26. Hoover Will Meet With Operators and Union Officials at Administration Conference, New York Times, p. 1, July …
  27. Hoover Says Coal Conference Are Held In Secrecy, New York Times, p. 8, July 4, 1922.
  28. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  29. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  30. Sauer Beverly, “The Impact of Gender in the Workplace,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Dece…