Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 1994

Challengerthrough the Eyes of Feyerabend

Paul M. Dombrowski Ohio University

Abstract

Paul Feyerabend elucidated the role of prior adherence to scientific theory in shaping subsequent perceptions of data. Thus one's theory choice shapes data, rather than data shaping theory, as is traditionally held. Feyerabend's philosophy also downplays the role of raw data, emphasizing instead debate among competing theories. This iconoclastic philosophy yields important new insights into the Challenger disaster, insights consonant with yet distinct from those of social constructionism. We learn from it the salience of meaning rather than raw data; the powerful role of prior conceptualizations in shaping the data of experience; and the surprising need for debate and pluralism for the wholesome pursuit of science and technology.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1994-01-01
DOI
10.2190/wxny-rq8c-j9l8-0qeq
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

  1. Frost (2013)
    Transcultural Risk Communication on Dauphin Island: An Analysis of Ironically L…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Moran et al. (2012)
    A Bibliography of Works Published in the History of Professional Communication …
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Malone (2007)
    Historical Studies of Technical Communication in the United States and England:…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Dombrowski (2002)
    Language and Empiricism
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Dombrowski (2001)
    Plastic Language for Plastic Science: The Rhetoric of Comrade Lysenko
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. Dombrowski (2000)
    Ethics and Technical Communication: The Past Quarter Century
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Ding (1998)
    Marxism, Ideology, Power and Scientific and Technical Writing
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. SMITH (1997)
    Intertextual Connections to “A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing”
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Valletta et al. (1995)
    “In-Determinacy” in Science and Discourse: A Rhetoric of Disciplinary Levels
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (28) · 9 in this index

  1. Journet (1990)
    Writing, Rhetoric, and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Dombrowski P. M. (1992)
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Dombrowski (1991)
    The lessons of the Challenger investigations
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Pace (1988)
    Technical Communication, Group Differentiation, and the Decision to Launch the …
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Winsor (1988)
    Communication failures contributing to the Challenger accident: an example for …
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 28 →
  1. Winsor (1990)
    The Construction of Knowledge in Organizations: Asking the Right Questions abou…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Feyerabend P. (1988)
    Against Method
  3. Kuhn T. S. (1970)
    The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
  4. United States
    Report to the President by the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident
  5. Weaver R. M. (1970)
    Language is Sermonic
  6. 10.1525/9780520340664
     ↗
  7. Dubos R. (1968)
    So Human an Animal
  8. Ellul J. (1964)
    The Technological Society
  9. Winner L. (1977)
    Autonomous Technology
  10. United States
    Investigation of the Challenger Accident: Report of the Committee on Science and Technology
  11. 10.1080/00335639009383932
     ↗
  12. Keller E. F. (1985)
    Reflections on Gender and Science
  13. Bleier R. (1984)
    Science and Gender
  14. Harding S. (1986)
    The Science Question in Feminism
  15. Tuana N. (1989)
    Feminism & Science
  16. Rorty R. (1982)
    Consequences of Pragmatism
  17. Rorty R. (1991)
    Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth
  18. Halloran (1978)
    Technical Writing and the Rhetoric of Science
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  19. 10.2307/375964
     ↗
  20. Dombrowski (1991)
    The lessons of the Challenger investigations
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  21. Dombrowski (1992)
    Challengerand the social contingency of meaning: Two lessons for the technical …
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  22. DOMBROWSKI (1992)
    A Comment on “The Construction of Knowledge in Organizations: Asking the Right …
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  23. Dombrowski Paul M.
    Humanistic Aspects of Technical Communication
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2026
    Book Review: Environmental Preservation and the Grey Cliffs Conflict: Negotiating Common Narratives, Values, and Ethos PickeringK. (2024). Environmental Preservation and the Grey Cliffs Conflict: Negotiating Common Narratives, Values, and Ethos. Utah State University Press, 268 pp. ↗
    Mia Twomey
    argument book reviews
  2. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  3. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Associations of adolescents’ argumentative writing scores and growth when evaluated by different human raters and artificial intelligence models ↗
    Deborah K. Reed; Sterett Mercer
    argument artificial intelligence
  4. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Apr 2026
    Psyche or Soma?: An Analysis of the Medical Debates Over the Diagnosis and Treatment of “Transsexualism” ↗
    Samantha Rippetoe
    rhetorical criticism argument archival research
  5. Argumentation Mar 2026
    The Recursive Argument Structure Reconsidered ↗
    Shiyang Yu
    argument