Plastic Language for Plastic Science: The Rhetoric of Comrade Lysenko

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jul 2001

Plastic Language for Plastic Science: The Rhetoric of Comrade Lysenko

Paul M. Dombrowski University of Central Florida

Abstract

Rhetoric of science reveals the role of rhetoric in the complex social enterprise that is standard science. Rhetoric plays a role in non-standard science too. The recent elucidation of the human genetic code calls to mind an earlier, tragic episode in the history of genetics, Lysenkoism in Stalinist Russia. It involved the repudiation of standard science in favor of an insular, intuitive, and anti-intellectual “science” called agrobiology which supposedly could shape agricultural productivity to political will. The tragedy is that careers were ruined and millions suffered starvation as the new “science” failed to bear its predicted fruit. Whether seen as a debased rhetoric of science or as a rhetoric of debased science, it assumed that language is plastic and can support a plastically reconceived “science” that reflected the plasticity of nature itself. This plastic rhetoric is strikingly similar to Plato's view of sophism, which of course differs considerably from contemporary views of sophism.

Journal: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published: 2001-07-01
DOI: 10.2190/uqdl-mtvp-m3tt-d3rd
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

Zerbe et al. (2025)

The Rhetoric of Science in (Times of) Crisis

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Moran et al. (2012)

A Bibliography of Works Published in the History of Professional Communication …

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Dombrowski (2006)

The Two Shuttle Accident Reports: Context and Culture in Technical Communication

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (2)

Dombrowski (1994)

<i>Challenger</i>through the Eyes of Feyerabend

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Dombrowski (1992)

<i>Challenger</i>and the social contingency of meaning: Two lessons for the tec…

Technical Communication Quarterly

Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓

10.1111/0036-0341.00005

↗
10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105967

↗
10.1126/science.149.3681.275

↗
10.1038/scientificamerican0700-78

↗
10.7312/medv92664

↗
10.1525/9780520341715

↗
10.1353/con.1993.0021

↗
Kapitza S., Antiscience Trends in the U.S.S.R., Scientific American, pp. 32–38, August 1991.

↗
10.1086/416948

↗
10.1086/416949

↗
10.1086/416950

↗
10.1086/417797

↗
10.1086/416951

↗
10.1086/416952

↗
10.2190/HAT

↗
10.1109/47.406727

↗
10.1109/47.108666

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →