Abstract

A longitudinal study of four engineers shows that moving into positions of authority and responsibility allows them to claim agency within the structure of the organization. However, that structure is less stable than it first appears, and they use writing to try to establish it in a way that will allow them to achieve their goals. Agency seems to consist of the conjunction of discursively established positions in the organization and participants' taking organizational intents as their own.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2006-10-01
DOI
10.1207/s15427625tcq1504_1
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (25)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 25 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  9. Technical Communication Quarterly
  10. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  11. Technical Communication Quarterly
  12. Technical Communication Quarterly
  13. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  14. Computers and Composition
  15. Written Communication
  16. Advances in the History of Rhetoric
  17. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  18. Technical Communication Quarterly
  19. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  20. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (20) · 3 in this index

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Tra…
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (J. B. Thompson, Ed.; G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Camb…
  4. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
  5. Foucault, M. (1979). What is an author? In J. V. Harari (Ed.), Textual strategies: Perspectives in post-struc…
Show all 20 →
  1. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Prentice Hall.
  2. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University…
  3. 10.1353/par.2004.0020
  4. Haraway, D. J. (1996). Modest witness: Feminist diffractions in science studies. In P. Galison & D. J. Stump …
  5. Katz, S. M. (1998). The dynamics of writing review: Opportunities for growth and change in the workplace. Sta…
  6. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: …
  7. Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  8. McCarthy, L. P. (1991). A psychiatrist using DSM-III: The influence of a charter document in psychiatry. In C…
  9. Written Communication
  10. Miller, C. R. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), G…
  11. Schryer, C. F., Lingard, L., Spafford, M. & Garwood, K. (2003). Structure and agency in medical case presenta…
  12. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  13. Winsor, D. A. (1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associat…
  14. Written Communication
  15. Winsor, D. A. (2003). Writing power: Communication in an engineering center. Albany: State University of New …