Abstract

ABSTRACT This article considers the emergence of methodological patterns, or “sanctioned narratives,” within feminist rhetorical historiography, arguing that with just a few exceptions these patterns have anchored our work to conceptions of the woman-as-rhetor exercising deliberate, strategic agency against her world, rather than within it. While this conception has been enormously productive in redefining what “counts” in the history of rhetoric, it also constrains our attempts to pursue broader methodological projects that take as their subject the interworkings of rhetoric, power, and gender. After describing the ways that existing methodological patterns have become entrenched, this article offers one method for shifting our commitments, a feminist-materialist methodology. Influenced by theories of posthuman agency and by actor-network theory, this method can help feminist rhetoricians pursue broader conceptions of rhetoric that will allow us to intervene more effectively in the rhetorical production and transformation of gender relations and power dynamics.

Journal
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published
2012-01-01
DOI
10.1080/15362426.2012.657044
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Communication Design Quarterly
  2. Communication Design Quarterly

Cites in this index (11)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 11 →
  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. College English
  5. College English
  6. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 2 works outside this index ↓
  1. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory
  2. Articulation: A Working Paper on Rhetoric and Taxis
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
CrossRef global citation count: 35 View in citation network →