Abstract

Recent scholarship in rhetoric and composition studies theorizes agency as irreducible to human cause-and-effect. While this theory infiltrates many disciplinary conversations, however, our reliance on the terms students and teachers within pedagogical discourses manages our rhetorical imagination of pedagogical agency by committing us to individual, human agents every time we invoke these terms. Rather than expel these terms and the important work they underwrite, we can draw on social systems terminology of elements and relations in order to account for the ways that students and teachers emerge as agents and to imagine alternative conceptualizations of pedagogical agency.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2015-04-03
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2015.1008916
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (9)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Pedagogy
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. College English
Show all 9 →
  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1215/9780822395324
  2. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self
  3. 10.2307/821361
  4. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things
  5. 10.2307/357715
  6. A Grammar of Motives
  7. Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy
  8. 10.1215/9780822392996
  9. Networking Arguments: Rhetoric, Transnational Feminism, and Public Policy Writing
  10. 10.1353/clj.2010.a471044
    Community Literacy Journal  
  11. 10.1080/15362426.2012.657044
  12. A Counter-History of Composition: Toward Methodologies of Complexity
  13. Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications
  14. Beyond Outcomes: Assessment and Instruction Within a University Writing Program
  15. Genre in a Changing World
  16. 10.1215/9780822390442
  17. 10.2307/376957
  18. 10.37514/WAC-J.2005.16.1.03
    WAC Journal  
  19. 10.2307/356689
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →