Shifting rhetorical agency in multimodal UX composition with AI: Sharing rhetorical authority with technologies

Computers and Composition Mar 2026 Open Access

Shifting rhetorical agency in multimodal UX composition with AI: Sharing rhetorical authority with technologies

Nupoor Ranade Carnegie Mellon University ; Daniel L. Hocutt University of Richmond

Abstract

Content personalization or tailoring content as per the needs of users has been a focus of technical communicators’ work since a very long time. Recently, algorithms have helped trace users’ characteristics such as devices they use, platforms they work on, local language spoken, etc. to personalize content through strategies like responsive content, automatic translation and so on. AI tools have extended algorithmic capabilities for personalization, but at the same time increased the randomness of personalized content. That is, algorithms produce different results for the same user at different times or different results for different users at the same time with the same prompt thus shifting the agency of both rhetors (or content creators) and the audience (or content users). While conventional technical communication pedagogy has focused on writing for users, and more recently on writing for algorithms which serve the users, today it is crucial to understand how technologies like AI impact knowledge consumption processes from a user experience perspective? And how can we teach content personalization and adaptive techniques in the increasingly digital spaces of audience interactions? These questions motivated our research. To follow the roles of algorithms and technical communicators closely, we analyzed three different case studies where algorithms are responsible for a high level of personalization beyond the decisions made by technical communicators. Our findings suggest that we must teach students to investigate concepts such as user personas in UX for understanding audiences, several methods of decision-making for content assets, and rhetorical ecology for a holistic view of content production to dissemination.

Journal: Computers and Composition
Published: 2026-03-01
DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102973
Open Access: OA PDF Hybrid
Topics: multimodality

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (17)

Johnson (2025)

Rhetoric Re-View: Five Approaches to Rhetorical Agency

Rhetoric Review
Hocutt (2024)

Composing with generative AI on digital advertising platforms

Computers and Composition
Ranade et al. (2024)

Introduction: Composing with generative AI

Computers and Composition
Verhulsdonck et al. (2022)

Tactical (Dis)connection in Smart Cities: Postconnectivist Technical Communicat…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Verhulsdonck et al. (2020)

Creating Content That Influences People: Considering User Experience and Behavi…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Show all 17 →

Walsh et al. (2017)

Forum: Bruno Latour on Rhetoric

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Moore et al. (2016)

Revisualizing Composition: How First-Year Writers Use Composing Technologies

Computers and Composition
Andersen (2014)

Rhetorical Work in the Age of Content Management

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Haas (2012)

Race, Rhetoric, and Technology

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Rivers et al. (2011)

Ecological, Pedagogical, Public Rhetoric

College Composition and Communication
Clark (2007)

Content Management and the Separation of Presentation and Content

Technical Communication Quarterly
Edbauer (2005)

Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorica…

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Geisler (2004)

How ought we to understand the concept of rhetorical agency? Report from the ARS

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Albers (2003)

Multidimensional Audience Analysis for Dynamic Information

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Johnson (1997)

Audience involved: Toward a participatory model of writing

Computers and Composition
Sommers (1993)

I Stand Here Writing

College English
Katz (1992)

The Ethic of Expediency: Classical Rhetoric, Technology, and the Holocaust

College English

Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓

Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum. In U. Arend, E. Eberleh, & K. Pitschke, (eds.), Softwa…

↗
Hocutt (2024)

SEO as audience analysis: Accounting for algorithms in content strategy

Technical Communication ↗
Hocutt (2022)

Localizing content: The roles of technical & professional communicators and machine learn…

Technical Communication ↗
Jeevan (2006)

A selective review of research in content personalization

Library Review ↗
Khataei (2015)

Personalized presentation builder for persuasive communication

Communication Design Quarterly Review ↗
Lavie (2010)

User attitudes towards news content personalization

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies ↗
Ranade, N. (2020, October). The real-time audience: Data analytics and audience measurements. In Proceedings …

↗
Ranade (2024)

Understanding the Hidden User for Content Strategy

Technical Communication ↗
Rose (2017)

Making practice-level struggles visible: Researching UX practice to inform pedagogy

Communication Design Quarterly Review ↗
Tham (2023)

Smart education in smart cities: Layered implications for networked and ubiquitous learning

IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →