Computers and Composition Mar 2016

Revisualizing Composition: How First-Year Writers Use Composing Technologies

Jessie L. Moore Elon University ; Paula Rosinski Elon University ; Tim Peeples Elon University ; Stacey Pigg North Carolina State University ; Martine Courant Rife Lansing Community College ; Beth Brunk-Chavez ; Dundee Lackey Texas Woman's University ; Suzanne Kesler Rumsey Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne ; Robyn Tasaka University of Hawaii–West Oahu ; Paul Curran Kenyon College ; Jeffrey T. Grabill Michigan State University
Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2016-03-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (18)

  1. Ranade et al. (2026)
    Shifting rhetorical agency in multimodal UX composition with AI: Sharing rhetor…
    Computers and Composition
  2. Richter (2025)
    Designing Social Media Learning Environments to Promote Digital Literacy
    Communication Design Quarterly
  3. Gupta et al. (2024)
    “Wayfinding” through the AI wilderness: Mapping rhetorics of ChatGPT prompt wri…
    Computers and Composition
  4. Harris et al. (2022)
    Using Multimedia for Instructor Presence in Purposeful Pedagogy-Driven Online T…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Richter (2021)
    Writing With Reddiquette: Networked Agonism and Structured Deliberation in Netw…
    Computers and Composition
Show all 18 →
  1. Harris et al. (2021)
    Using Multimedia for Instructor Presence in Purposeful Pedagogy-Driven Online T…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Gold et al. (2020)
    Who’s Afraid of Facebook? A Survey of Students’ Online Writing Practices
    College Composition and Communication
  3. Amicucci (2020)
    Experimenting with Writing Identities on Facebook through Intertextuality and I…
    Computers and Composition
  4. Einum (2020)
    Written participation with response technology – How teachers ask and students …
    Computers and Composition
  5. Green (2019)
    Smartphones, Distraction Narratives, and Flexible Pedagogies: Students’ Mobile …
    Computers and Composition
  6. Caravella et al. (2019)
    The Rebel Alliance: Analyzing Student Resistance in Digital Reflective Writing
    Computers and Composition
  7. Blevins (2018)
    Teaching Digital Literacy Composing Concepts: Focusing on the Layers of Augment…
    Computers and Composition
  8. Tham et al. (2018)
    Guest Editors’ Introduction: Immersive Technologies and Writing Pedagogy
    Computers and Composition
  9. Wood (2018)
    Framing Wearing: Genre, Embodiment, and Exploring Wearable Technology in the Co…
    Computers and Composition
  10. Euteneuer (2018)
    Conspicuous Computing: Gamified Bodies, Playful Composition, and the Monsters i…
    Computers and Composition
  11. Cunningham (2018)
    “wuz good wit u bro”: Patterns of Digital African American Language Use in Two …
    Computers and Composition
  12. Kreniske (2017)
    How First-year Students Expressed Their Transition to College Experiences Diffe…
    Computers and Composition
  13. Licastro (2017)
    The problem of multimodality: what data-driven research can tell us about onlin…
    Communication Design Quarterly

References (20) · 6 in this index

  1. Adsanatham et al. (2013)
    Re-Inventing Digital Delivery for Multimodal Composing: A Theory and Heuristic …
    Computers and Composition
  2. Alvey (2011)
    From I-search to iSearch 2.0
    English Teaching: Practice and Critique
  3. Carter et al. (2011)
    Tubing the Future: Participatory Pedagogy and YouTube U in 2020
    Computers and Composition
  4. Frost (2011)
    Why Teachers Must Learn: Student Innovation as a Driving Factor in the Future o…
    Computers and Composition
  5. Fulkerson (2014)
    Time 2 tlk 2nite: Use of electronic media by adolescents during family meals and associat…
    Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics  ↗
Show all 20 →
  1. Geisler et al. (2001)
    IText: Future Directions for Research on the Relationship between Information T…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Jones (2010)
    Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university?
    Computers & Education  ↗
  3. Lenhart, Amanda. (2012, Mar 19). Teens, smartphones, & texting. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Rep…
  4. Lenhart, Amanda; Arafeh, Sousan; Smith, Aaron. & Macgill, Alexandra. (2008, April 24). Writing, technology an…
  5. Madden, Mary; Lenhart, Amanda; Duggan, Maeve; Cortesi, Sandra. & Gasser, Urs. (2013). Teens & technology 2013…
  6. McClure (2011)
    WritingResearchWriting: The Semantic Web and the Future of the Research Project
    Computers and Composition
  7. Mueller (2009)
    Digital Underlife in the Networked Writing Classroom
    Computers and Composition
  8. Purcell, Kristen; Buchanan, Judy. & Friedrich, Linda. (2013). The impact of digital tools on student writing …
  9. Revisualizing Composition Study Group. (2010). The writing lives of college students. Writing in Digital Envi…
  10. Shipka (2011)
    Toward a composition made whole
  11. Sommers (2008)
    The call of research: A longitudinal view of writing development
    College Composition and Communication
  12. Stanford study of writing. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://ssw.stanford.edu/index.php.
  13. Thompson (2013)
    The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning
    Computers & Education  ↗
  14. Waycott (2010)
    Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies
    Computers & Education  ↗
  15. Yancey, Kathleen Blake. (2009). Writing in the 21st century: A report from the National Council of Teachers o…
CrossRef global citation count: 29 View in citation network → Build reading path →