Abstract

This corpus-based study investigates the grammatical stance constructions in CEO statements within the annual reports of U.S. and Vietnamese banks from 2020 to 2022. The findings indicate that modality is the dominant stance type followed by attitudinal and epistemic stance markers. Both groups of bank leaders favor desire/intention/decision verbs with infinitive complement clauses, certainty/likelihood verbs controlling complement clauses, and volition/prediction modality. But variations exist in the specific stance devices employed to shape corporate image and engage with stakeholders. These findings provide insights into cross-cultural corporate discourse in the banking sector and have valuable implications for business writing and professional communication.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
10.1177/10506519251404887
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (55) · 1 in this index

  1. Measuring and assessing tone at the top using annual report CEO letters
  2. Anthony L. (2020). AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer software]. Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthon…
  3. 10.1177/0021943607313993
  4. 10.4324/9780203892299
  5. 10.1177/1750481309351208
Show all 55 →
  1. 10.1075/scl.23
  2. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect
    Text & Talk
  3. Longman grammar of spoken and written English
  4. 10.3366/cor.2018.0137
  5. 10.1075/ps.7.1.03bon
  6. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology
  7. 10.4324/9780203697078
  8. 10.1177/0261927X08322481
  9. 10.1177/1750481311427788
  10. 10.1093/applin/amw058
  11. Beyond culture
  12. Hardie A. (2014). Log ratio: An informal introduction. ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science (C…
  13. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations acros…
  14. 10.1016/j.esp.2024.06.001
  15. 10.1515/text-2017-0041
  16. Written Communication
  17. 10.1177/002194369803500203
  18. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing
  19. 10.1093/applin/25.2.156
  20. 10.1108/13563281111156871
  21. 10.1075/hsm.12.10jun
  22. Grammatical stance marking across registers: Revisiting the formal-informal dichotomy
    Register Studies
  23. 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102872
  24. 10.1177/17504813211026541
  25. 10.1111/ijal.12512
  26. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.009
  27. 10.1016/j.esp.2023.01.004
  28. 10.1108/17465681211271314
  29. 10.1057/9780230511910
  30. 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00036-9
  31. 10.2469/faj.v42.n5.66
  32. 10.1017/CBO9780511981395
  33. 10.1108/09513571111124036
  34. 10.1177/1750481317697860
  35. 10.1080/23311975.2024.2429797
  36. 10.1016/j.esp.2025.08.001
  37. Language has a heart
    Text & Talk
  38. Modality and the English modals
  39. 10.1108/CCIJ-03-2016-0025
  40. 10.1108/CCIJ-02-2013-0011
  41. Rayson P. (2008). Log-likelihood and effect size calculator. https://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard.html.
  42. Appraisal analysis of adjectives in letters to shareholders from British and spanish companies
    Pragmalingüística
  43. Data, description, discourse
  44. 10.1075/btl.100
  45. 10.1002/csr.69
  46. 10.1007/978-3-031-36690-1_8
  47. 10.1108/13217341111181069
  48. 10.17398/2340-2784.48.295
  49. 10.1016/j.esp.2024.11.003
  50. 10.1515/csh-2023-0017