Abstract

This article draws on activity theory, politics of the artifact, and speech act theory to analyze how language practices and technology interplay in establishing the social relationships necessary for globally networked teams. Specifically, it uses activity theory to examine how linguistic infelicities and the politics of communication technologies interplay in virtual meetings, thereby demonstrating the importance of grounding professional communication instruction in social as well as technical effectiveness. That is, students must learn not only how to communicate technical concepts clearly and concisely and recognize cultural differences but also how to use language and choose media in ways that produce the social conditions necessary for effective collaboration in globally networked environments. The article analyzes two case studies—a workplace and a classroom—that illustrate how the mediating functions of language and the politics of technology intersect as mediating tools in globally networked activity systems. It then traces the implications of that intersection for professional communication theory and pedagogy.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2010-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651910363275
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 8 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (8)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 8 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 32 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1109/TPC.2006.870459
  2. 10.1016/j.asw.2006.07.001
  3. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
  4. 10.1023/A:1022583918064
  5. 10.1109/TPC.2006.890849
  6. 10.1207/s15327884mca0404_6
  7. 10.1109/TPC.2004.828203
  8. 10.1109/TPC.2007.902654
  9. 10.1287/orsc.10.6.693
  10. 10.1080/01596300410001692111
  11. 10.1080/01580370600947389
  12. 10.1016/j.bushor.2007.02.005
  13. 10.1109/TPC.2008.2007861
  14. 10.1287/isre.1040.0028
  15. 10.1007/BF02299477
  16. 10.1109/TPC.2005.849649
  17. 10.1007/s10606-005-9002-z
  18. 10.1109/TPC.2010.2052857
  19. Nardi, B.A. & Whittaker, S. ( 2002). The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. In P. Hinds…
  20. 10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4
  21. Olson, J.S., Teasley, S., Covi, L. & Olson, G. ( 2002). The (currently) unique advantages of collocated work …
  22. 10.4018/978-1-59904-893-2.ch003
  23. 10.1109/TPC.2004.843292
  24. Schryer, C.F., Lingard, L. & Spafford, M. ( 2007). Regularized practices: Genres, improvisation, and identity…
  25. Rationality in action
  26. 10.2190/CPIC3
  27. 10.1109/TPC.2007.2000058
  28. 10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500143
  29. 10.1177/009365092019001003
  30. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03025.x
  31. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.001
  32. 10.2190/CPIC1
CrossRef global citation count: 26 View in citation network →