Abstract

At a multinational company, daily written communication between staff, supervisors, customers, and suppliers is frequently conducted using digital tools (e.g., emails, smartphones, and texting applications) often across multiple nationally, linguistically, and conceptually defined borders. Determining digital tools’ impact on intercultural encounters in professional environments like these is difficult but important given the sheer volume of digital contact in technical and professional environments and the ongoing global struggle to broker peace and productivity amid communities’ many perceived differences. Using examples drawn from a case study of binational manufacturing sister companies, I build on recent work in professional, networked written communication to analyze two WhatsApp exchanges, one between a central study participant and his customer, another between the participant and an employee. This study shows how asynchronous digital communication tools created complex “silences” in writing between participants. In these silences (e.g., a lack of or delayed response to a text) individuals try to explain others’ actions for themselves. Drawing on a combination of third-generation activity theory and Latourian actor-network theory, I show that while explaining others’ actions in writing with whatever cultural shorthand is available may remain a common part of everyday life and research, it can be a poor guide for explaining others’ actions, especially in digital writing. My study shows how research of, and instruction in, digital tool use in intercultural writing contexts requires attention to the material conditions and objectives potentially shaping one’s own as well as others’ composition choices.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2020-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088319899908
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (15)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 15 →
  1. College English
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. Written Communication
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Written Communication
  9. Technical Communication Quarterly
  10. Written Communication
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4324/9781410617385
  2. 10.1177/1368431008099642
  3. 10.4324/9780203879900
  4. 10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003
  5. 10.1002/9781118504871.ch11
  6. Holliday A., MacDonald M. N. (2019). Researching the intercultural: Intersubjectivity and the problem with po…
  7. 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_2
  8. 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
  9. 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_5
  10. 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_4
  11. 10.7330/9781607326649.c009
  12. 10.7330/9781607326649
  13. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjqwx
  14. 10.4324/9781351203074-5
  15. 10.1017/CBO9780511809989.007
  16. 10.7551/mitpress/6875.001.0001
  17. 10.1017/CBO9780511509605
  18. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744763.001.0001
  19. 10.4018/978-1-61350-450-5
  20. 10.1111/johs.12124
  21. Tokunaga R. S. (2009). High-speed internet access to the other: The influence of cultural orientations on sel…
  22. Walther J. B., Burgoon J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communi…
  23. 10.2190/CPI
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →